Pages with the most revisions
Showing below up to 250 results in range #51 to #300.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
- NED (24 revisions)
- DSS description Handbook (24 revisions)
- Guidelines for the Country Report (23 revisions)
- SIPAFIT (23 revisions)
- Estonia (Country Report) (23 revisions)
- AFFOREST-sDSS (23 revisions)
- Case Studies (23 revisions)
- ForestGALES (22 revisions)
- 1. Defining the problem (21 revisions)
- Wg3 workplan (21 revisions)
- Esc (21 revisions - redirect page)
- Case-Lessons by WG themes matrix (21 revisions)
- Agflor (21 revisions)
- EMIS (20 revisions)
- SADMVMC (20 revisions)
- AVVIRK-2000 (20 revisions)
- Wg1 workplan (18 revisions)
- 2011-06 Thessaloniki Case Study Notes by WG (18 revisions)
- Participatory planning case template (18 revisions)
- Question: Which DSSs have spatial context (18 revisions)
- Has description (17 revisions)
- FMPP (17 revisions)
- Woodstock (16 revisions)
- Vista (15 revisions)
- HARVEST (15 revisions)
- Wiki TaskForce (15 revisions)
- Need of flexibilization of analytical tools - no overdesigned tool that provides too much features for the use (14 revisions)
- Wg2 workplan (14 revisions)
- Mesta (14 revisions)
- Import Lessons from test wiki (14 revisions)
- Classification of Knowledge Management tools (14 revisions)
- SADfLOR/SAGfLOR (14 revisions)
- FFIREDESSYS (14 revisions)
- Conifer Timber Quality (13 revisions)
- MELA (13 revisions)
- EnerTree (13 revisions)
- Case Studies Analysis (13 revisions)
- Case Studies List (12 revisions)
- Herbicideadvisor (12 revisions)
- MONTE (12 revisions)
- Explore (12 revisions)
- ToSIA (12 revisions)
- COST Action FP0804: FORSYS:Community Portal (11 revisions)
- Question: Question: Which DSSs use Stochastic programming (11 revisions)
- Lower-case property values (import error) (11 revisions)
- OSMOSE (11 revisions)
- Emis (11 revisions - redirect page)
- It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development (11 revisions)
- Which kinds of DSS focus on landscape quality (11 revisions)
- SADfLOR/INfLOR (11 revisions)
- Participatory processes and Knowledge management Workgroup progress reports (11 revisions)
- Monsu (11 revisions)
- HMSS (11 revisions)
- Guidelines/Problem Type 1 (10 revisions)
- Test (10 revisions)
- Sim4Tree (10 revisions)
- RPF (10 revisions)
- Update detailed documentation of how to create / edit new DSSs (10 revisions)
- Lessons from Country Studies (10 revisions)
- FVS (10 revisions)
- Guideline (10 revisions)
- The Forest Time Machine (10 revisions)
- Test template (9 revisions)
- Neighbourhood interrelations should be included in the generator (9 revisions)
- Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) (9 revisions)
- Question: Which DSSs are developed/used to address that specific Forsys problem? (9 revisions)
- Hugin (9 revisions)
- To compare the current and the past quantitative-qualitative parameters of the forest, great effort (9 revisions)
- 2011-11 Leuven Case Study Agenda (9 revisions)
- EFISCEN (9 revisions)
- Properties - Has domain - Has DSS development stage (9 revisions)
- The definition of standardized and specific criteria for selecting and zoning forest compartment (9 revisions)
- Success criteria (8 revisions)
- Case Study Literature Methods (8 revisions)
- Заглавная страница (8 revisions)
- Adapting the software to make it possible to easily include also the output of other mechanistic (8 revisions)
- Question: Which DSSs support multiple objectives (8 revisions)
- Contry Report Category (8 revisions)
- GB Forestry DSS (8 revisions)
- SIMFLOR (8 revisions)
- The adoption of the collaborative learning method made possible to gradually select the conceptual (8 revisions)
- AFFOREST-sDSS.Description of DSS development (8 revisions)
- Users preferred enhanced functionality rather than useability (8 revisions)
- Question: Which DSSs were developed by large team of people (8 revisions)
- Using Actor Network Theory in the design stage can help in understanding the dynamism of the network (8 revisions)
- Import queries and other pages from the testwiki (8 revisions)
- The choice to develop the system in an Excel environment was based on the status of computer (8 revisions)
- The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more (8 revisions)
- Students studying forest management planning procedures and processes were very useful product testers (8 revisions)
- Provide missing help-documentation service (7 revisions)
- The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable (7 revisions)
- The kinds of DSS traditionally used to calculate timber harvest levels are now being used to model (7 revisions)
- Wiki editing (7 revisions)
- Participation in forest planning in Sardinia (7 revisions)
- DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts to non-professional stakeholders (7 revisions)
- Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process (7 revisions)
- Participatory Planning in a Pulpwood Supply Chain Planning in a Portuguese integrated Pulp and Paper Company (7 revisions)
- 2011-06 Thessaloniki Case Study Notes by Research Phase (7 revisions)
- Case-Lessons by ID with WG themes (7 revisions)
- Regular ongoing engagement helped maintain interest of users (7 revisions)
- Geo-SIMA-HWIND (7 revisions)
- AFFOREST-sDSS.Decision support techniques (7 revisions)
- Some pages do not display (7 revisions)
- TerEval (7 revisions)
- DSS can help in varying the treatment according to more than one forest function (7 revisions)
- TEAMS (7 revisions)
- HARVEST.Software (7 revisions)
- AFFOREST-sDSS.Knowledge management process (7 revisions)
- Community of Practice (7 revisions)
- The DSS models built must match the knowledge of the local forest managers, so the ability for local (7 revisions)
- SIPAFIT can act sometimes as a referee to settle arguments among experts, users and stakeholders (7 revisions)
- Need for new models for the later use of a tool (7 revisions)
- Provide a simple version of the DSS, which new users can try out and learn quickly (7 revisions)
- Actor Network Theory provides a suitable lens for exploring both technical and human aspects of DSS institutionalization in the forestry domain (7 revisions)
- Need of a moderator function (7 revisions)
- STSM Call 2012-12 (7 revisions)
- Herbicide Advisor (6 revisions)
- Criterium DecisionPlus (6 revisions)
- Wiki User's glossary (6 revisions)
- ForestGales (6 revisions)
- Information about the properties (6 revisions)
- Sim4Tree.Decision support techniques (6 revisions)
- The scope of the modeling project can change significantly during the project (6 revisions)
- FORSYS Problem dimensions - necessary or not for Lesson (6 revisions)
- From a management perspective, to avoid the complication of testing something new, the models used (6 revisions)
- Finland-Strategic planning at the national forest administration (6 revisions)
- The activation of an iterative process through periodical meetings permitted to all the stakeholders (6 revisions)
- Question: DSS for evaluating options (6 revisions)
- DSS architecture and design Workplan 2013 (6 revisions)
- Import data Methods and Dimensions (WG2) (6 revisions)
- T(ree) (6 revisions)
- ETÇAP (6 revisions)
- The tracing of the current actor network interactions made the group realize that they need a different kind of stakeholders from what they previously thought (6 revisions)
- Combo box vs. multiple values (Has other models) (6 revisions)
- The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process (6 revisions)
- ClimChAlp (6 revisions)
- SimForTree (6 revisions)
- A financial analysis is an important component in the discussion about the preferences of different (6 revisions)
- Italy-A comprehensive system for forest management planning in Trentino Province (6 revisions)
- Question: Which FMDSS consider Non Wood Forest Products (6 revisions)
- DSS for managing forest fire casualties (6 revisions)
- Heureka/RegWise (6 revisions)
- An optimisation module comparing alternative scenarios based on multi-criteria analysis should be (6 revisions)
- Methods and Models (6 revisions)
- 3. Evaluating options (6 revisions)
- The development of large and enduring systems requires a long term approach (6 revisions)
- Enlarged decision space (6 revisions)
- Case Studies Lessons List (6 revisions)
- New structure of the wiki start page (6 revisions)
- HaRPPS (6 revisions)
- Embedding a DSS in a GIS software allows obtaining information at different spatial scales using the (6 revisions)
- TAURON (5 revisions)
- Quality flag: implementation still hanging (5 revisions)
- Test query (5 revisions)
- Interpretative case studies can help reduce the gap between research and practice (5 revisions)
- Knowledge management process - definitions of alternatives are not clear enough fro a non-expert user (5 revisions)
- Use of adequate DSS development methodology (5 revisions)
- Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions (5 revisions)
- Question: DSS Commercial Product (5 revisions)
- Lack of proper documentation and support services (manual, website, etc) can severely limit the (5 revisions)
- Afforestion and deforestation options should be included in the management options (5 revisions)
- Some of the queries in FAQ are not yet implemented (5 revisions)
- It is necessary to know which data will be use as variables in the models before designing the DSS (5 revisions)
- T (5 revisions)
- The tracing of the actor network supported the identification of the key actors influencing the collaborative DSS implementation and institutionalization (5 revisions)
- FORESTAR (5 revisions)
- SifPlan (5 revisions)
- Lessons from Survey (5 revisions)
- TestTable (5 revisions)
- The DSS gave the forest manager the opportunity to experiment how their emphasis towards certain (5 revisions)
- To meet the needs of customer - the Forest Service - and to obtain satisfying results the (5 revisions)
- Integration of decision support tools? (5 revisions)
- AFFOREST-sDSS.Software (5 revisions)
- WebCorky (5 revisions)
- SØK (5 revisions)
- AFFOREST-sDSS.Support of social participation (5 revisions)
- An iterative process of presenting results to subject matter experts enabled them to better (5 revisions)
- VDDT-Path (5 revisions)
- DSS helped document and apply decision criteria consistently, and therefore produced a more (5 revisions)
- Help page navigation link changed to Category:Help (5 revisions)
- SiWaWa (5 revisions)
- DSS lectures (5 revisions)
- South Africa.127 (4 revisions)
- Morocco.33 (4 revisions)
- Ireland.47 (4 revisions)
- United States-The forest plan revision process in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest (4 revisions)
- Brazil-DSS usage on sustainable natural forest management in the Amazon basin (4 revisions)
- Italy-ProgettoBosco a data-driven DSS for forest planning: an application in Abruzzo Region (4 revisions)
- Switzerland.73 (4 revisions)
- The very easy user-friendly interface of the software and the clearness of method can be exploited (4 revisions)
- Slovenia.113 (4 revisions)
- Germany.1 (4 revisions)
- Hungary.6 (4 revisions)
- ToSIA.Decision support techniques (4 revisions)
- Estonia.76 (4 revisions)
- Austria.19 (4 revisions)
- United Kingdom.8 (4 revisions)
- Portugal.75 (4 revisions)
- TAURON.Decision support techniques (4 revisions)
- Spain.102 (4 revisions)
- Spain.68 (4 revisions)
- Brazil-DSS usage on teak plantation (4 revisions)
- Italy.1 (4 revisions)
- South Africa.47 (4 revisions)
- Austria (4 revisions)
- China.40 (4 revisions)
- Ireland.81 (4 revisions)
- Switzerland.117 (4 revisions)
- DSS-WuK (4 revisions)
- Switzerland.92 (4 revisions)
- Denmark.5 (4 revisions)
- Chile.65 (4 revisions)
- Spatial variation between regions led to the development of different regional models, which led to (4 revisions)
- STSM Opportunity MBMS development (4 revisions)
- Finland.24 (4 revisions)
- Providing procedures and structure for data flow from selection of field sample, performing field (4 revisions)
- Slovenia.18 (4 revisions)
- Norway.39 (4 revisions)
- Germany.122 (4 revisions)
- Hungary.16 (4 revisions)
- Hungary.80 (4 revisions)
- United Kingdom.109 (4 revisions)
- Portugal-Integrating an ecosystem model into SADfLOR Decision Support platform for optimal forest management planning under changing climate in boreal conditions. (4 revisions)
- Sweden.75 (4 revisions)
- Portugal.34 (4 revisions)
- Portugal.98 (4 revisions)
- Question 1: Which DSSs can support the KM processes? (4 revisions)
- Spain.33 (4 revisions)
- United States.33 (4 revisions)
- Austria-Improving forestry extension services for small-scale private landowners (4 revisions)
- Spain.88 (4 revisions)
- Belgium-BoLa a specific sDSS to support land use planning in Flanders (4 revisions)
- SIPAFIT.Decision support techniques (4 revisions)
- WRR-DSS (4 revisions)
- Italy.56 (4 revisions)
- Canada.31 (4 revisions)
- Denmark.75 (4 revisions)
- 2. Exploring options (4 revisions)
- Russia.20 (4 revisions)
- Ireland.125 (4 revisions)
- Switzerland.54 (4 revisions)
- KM vocabularies (4 revisions)
- The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be (4 revisions)
- Use of the DSS has been considered successful by the participating organizations, even though it has (4 revisions)
- United States.1 (4 revisions)
- Question: DSS for defining a problem (4 revisions)
- Norway.95 (4 revisions)
- Hungary.37 (4 revisions)
- Running the DSS required special skills, therefore the local planning team required considerable (4 revisions)
- Estonia.25 (4 revisions)
