Difference between revisions of "Question: Which DSSs were developed by Sweden"
From forestDSS
(Created page with "== Question == * Topic of the query ... * Why this query, rationales ... * For whom is it relevant ... == Answer == Team of at least 5 people: {{#ask:Category:DSS[[Has DS...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Question == | == Question == | ||
| − | * | + | * What kinds of DSS tools were/are developed by Sweden collegues? Are they representing from University, company,researcher, freelancer? what areas of interest and issues are aiming to address? |
| − | * | + | * Are these tools are most sophisticated? support social participation? why they are interested for Heurika? |
| − | * | + | * Planner, business company, researcher, academicians... |
== Answer == | == Answer == | ||
Latest revision as of 18:02, 25 April 2013
Question
- What kinds of DSS tools were/are developed by Sweden collegues? Are they representing from University, company,researcher, freelancer? what areas of interest and issues are aiming to address?
- Are these tools are most sophisticated? support social participation? why they are interested for Heurika?
- Planner, business company, researcher, academicians...
Answer
Team of at least 5 people:
AFFOREST-sDSS, CONES, EFIMOD, EMDS, ETÇAP, EcologicalSiteClassification, LEaRNForME, PYL, ProgettoBosco, SIPAFIT, ToSIA
Comment
what about the results, why are they relevant ...
