Difference between revisions of "The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more"
From forestDSS
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "Stakeholder involvement in the development and use of DSS" to "Participation") |
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) (Forsys_add_wg_subthemes.py) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Lesson | {{Lesson | ||
+ | |ID=15 | ||
|Has statement=The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more transparent and easy-to-share to non-expert stakeholders. | |Has statement=The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more transparent and easy-to-share to non-expert stakeholders. | ||
− | |Has domain=Knowledge management, Participation, User interface and outputs | + | |Has evidence=The design process was rather ad-hoc and sequential, as a result of step-wise funding becoming available. Therefore, no overall scoping exercise was carried out at the start of the project and the general architecture of the system is inefficient and unstructured. |
− | + | |Has consequences=Many suggestions for improvements come from long term usage of the system. | |
+ | |Has recommendation for action=Since the beginning, provide adequate financing also for maintanance, and a stable multidisciplinary staff | ||
+ | |Has domain=Knowledge management, Participation, User interface and outputs, User interface and outputs | ||
|Has temporal scale=Long term (strategic), Medium term (tactical) | |Has temporal scale=Long term (strategic), Medium term (tactical) | ||
|Has spatial context=Spatial with no neighbourhood interrelations | |Has spatial context=Spatial with no neighbourhood interrelations | ||
Line 9: | Line 12: | ||
|Has goods and services dimension=Market wood products | |Has goods and services dimension=Market wood products | ||
|Has decision making dimension=Single decision maker | |Has decision making dimension=Single decision maker | ||
+ | |Has related DSS=STANDPACK | ||
|Has country=Italy | |Has country=Italy | ||
|Has related case=Italy-Analysis of logging residues chain for a sustainable bioenergy production in Alta Val di Non | |Has related case=Italy-Analysis of logging residues chain for a sustainable bioenergy production in Alta Val di Non | ||
+ | |Has actor perspective=Developer/Architect, User | ||
|Has working group theme=Dss development process, Knowledge management | |Has working group theme=Dss development process, Knowledge management | ||
|Has DSS development=The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more.Description of DSS development | |Has DSS development=The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more.Description of DSS development | ||
Line 16: | Line 21: | ||
|Has knowledge management processes=The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more.Knowledge management process | |Has knowledge management processes=The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more.Knowledge management process | ||
|Has support for social participation=The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more.Support of social participation | |Has support for social participation=The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more.Support of social participation | ||
− | |Has | + | |Has user role= |
+ | |Has researcher role= | ||
+ | |Has DSS development stage=Use | ||
+ | |Has developer role= | ||
}} | }} | ||
+ | [[Wg1::Interface]] |
Revision as of 20:55, 8 September 2013
Lesson
ID | 15 |
---|---|
Has statement | The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more transparent and easy-to-share to non-expert stakeholders. |
Has evidence | The design process was rather ad-hoc and sequential, as a result of step-wise funding becoming available. Therefore, no overall scoping exercise was carried out at the start of the project and the general architecture of the system is inefficient and unstructured. |
Has consequences | Many suggestions for improvements come from long term usage of the system. |
Has recommendation for action | Since the beginning, provide adequate financing also for maintanance, and a stable multidisciplinary staff |
Has domain | Knowledge management, Participation, User interface and outputs, User interface and outputs |
Has DSS development stage | Use |
Has decision stage | |
Has temporal scale | Long term (strategic), Medium term (tactical) |
Has spatial context | Spatial with no neighbourhood interrelations |
Has spatial scale | Forest level, Regional/national level |
Has objectives dimension | Single objective |
Has goods and services dimension | Market wood products |
Has decision making dimension | Single decision maker |
Has country | Italy |
Has reference | |
Has related DSS | STANDPACK |
Has related case | Italy-Analysis of logging residues chain for a sustainable bioenergy production in Alta Val di Non |
Has related lesson | |
Has other relevant information | |
Has working group theme | Dss development process, Knowledge management |
Has DSS development | The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more.Description of DSS development |
Has decision support techniques | The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more.Decision support techniques |
Has knowledge management processes | The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more.Knowledge management process |
Has support for social participation | The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more.Support of social participation |
Has actor perspective | Developer/Architect, User |
Has researcher role | |
Has user role | |
Has developer role |