The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be
From forestDSS
Revision as of 11:15, 17 September 2013 by Antoniofloris (Talk | contribs)
Lesson
ID | 67 |
---|---|
Has statement | The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be easily shared with others, so this process required considerably more time and effort than anticipated |
Has evidence | |
Has consequences | |
Has recommendation for action | |
Has domain | User interface and outputs |
Has DSS development stage | Use |
Has decision stage | design, choice |
Has temporal scale | |
Has spatial context | |
Has spatial scale | |
Has objectives dimension | |
Has goods and services dimension | |
Has decision making dimension | |
Has country | |
Has reference | |
Has related DSS | EMDS |
Has related case | United States-Watershed Condition Assessment for the Northwest Forest Plan |
Has related lesson | |
Has other relevant information | |
Has working group theme | Knowledge management, Participation |
Has DSS development | The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be.Description of DSS development |
Has decision support techniques | The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be.Decision support techniques |
Has knowledge management processes | The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be.Knowledge management process |
Has support for social participation | The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be.Support of social participation |
Has actor perspective | Facilitator, Researcher |
Has researcher role | Decision analyst, Modeler |
Has user role | Forest manager |
Has developer role |