Difference between revisions of "The analysis team used internal prototyping, which helped train the staff and identify possible"
From forestDSS
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) (Forsys_change_property_values.py) |
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) (Forsys_add_wg_subthemes.py) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Lesson | {{Lesson | ||
| − | | | + | |ID=68 |
|Has statement=The analysis team used internal prototyping, which helped train the staff and identify possible problems with the model | |Has statement=The analysis team used internal prototyping, which helped train the staff and identify possible problems with the model | ||
| − | |Has | + | |Has DSS development stage=Testing, Use |
|Has decision stage=organization | |Has decision stage=organization | ||
|Has related DSS=EMDS | |Has related DSS=EMDS | ||
|Has related case=United States-Watershed Condition Assessment for the Northwest Forest Plan | |Has related case=United States-Watershed Condition Assessment for the Northwest Forest Plan | ||
| − | |Has working group theme= | + | |Has working group theme=Knowledge management, Participation |
|Has DSS development=The analysis team used internal prototyping, which helped train the staff and identify possible.Description of DSS development | |Has DSS development=The analysis team used internal prototyping, which helped train the staff and identify possible.Description of DSS development | ||
|Has decision support techniques=The analysis team used internal prototyping, which helped train the staff and identify possible.Decision support techniques | |Has decision support techniques=The analysis team used internal prototyping, which helped train the staff and identify possible.Decision support techniques | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|Has actor perspective=Researcher | |Has actor perspective=Researcher | ||
|Has researcher role=Decision analyst, Modeler | |Has researcher role=Decision analyst, Modeler | ||
| − | |Has | + | |Has flag=yellow |
}} | }} | ||
| + | [[Wg3::Application]] | ||
Latest revision as of 02:36, 9 September 2013
Lesson
| ID | 68 |
|---|---|
| Has statement | The analysis team used internal prototyping, which helped train the staff and identify possible problems with the model |
| Has evidence | |
| Has consequences | |
| Has recommendation for action | |
| Has domain | |
| Has DSS development stage | Testing, Use |
| Has decision stage | organization |
| Has temporal scale | |
| Has spatial context | |
| Has spatial scale | |
| Has objectives dimension | |
| Has goods and services dimension | |
| Has decision making dimension | |
| Has country | |
| Has reference | |
| Has related DSS | EMDS |
| Has related case | United States-Watershed Condition Assessment for the Northwest Forest Plan |
| Has related lesson | |
| Has other relevant information | |
| Has working group theme | Knowledge management, Participation |
| Has DSS development | The analysis team used internal prototyping, which helped train the staff and identify possible.Description of DSS development |
| Has decision support techniques | The analysis team used internal prototyping, which helped train the staff and identify possible.Decision support techniques |
| Has knowledge management processes | The analysis team used internal prototyping, which helped train the staff and identify possible.Knowledge management process |
| Has support for social participation | The analysis team used internal prototyping, which helped train the staff and identify possible.Support of social participation |
| Has actor perspective | Researcher |
| Has researcher role | Decision analyst, Modeler |
| Has user role | |
| Has developer role |
