Difference between revisions of "Talk:Knowledge Management tools"
From forestDSS
(a few suggestions re page content and organization) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Wouldn't it be good for browsing this list to organize alphabetically? | Wouldn't it be good for browsing this list to organize alphabetically? | ||
| + | -> Yes I agree. | ||
Also, why not have a DSS topic? There is a whole compendium on DSS started on the wiki. So, for example, just add a link to the main page accessing DSS descriptions. | Also, why not have a DSS topic? There is a whole compendium on DSS started on the wiki. So, for example, just add a link to the main page accessing DSS descriptions. | ||
| + | -> I am not sure how you would like to organize that. Just proceed - that I can follow your suggestion | ||
Last, databases are not, properly speaking, tools. They are the product of a tool (e.g., a DBMS). I suggest we replace "database" with database management system. Examples would include things like Microsoft Access, SQL Server, etc. | Last, databases are not, properly speaking, tools. They are the product of a tool (e.g., a DBMS). I suggest we replace "database" with database management system. Examples would include things like Microsoft Access, SQL Server, etc. | ||
| + | |||
| + | -> I agree, should be changed, | ||
Revision as of 15:33, 11 December 2009
Wouldn't it be good for browsing this list to organize alphabetically? -> Yes I agree.
Also, why not have a DSS topic? There is a whole compendium on DSS started on the wiki. So, for example, just add a link to the main page accessing DSS descriptions. -> I am not sure how you would like to organize that. Just proceed - that I can follow your suggestion
Last, databases are not, properly speaking, tools. They are the product of a tool (e.g., a DBMS). I suggest we replace "database" with database management system. Examples would include things like Microsoft Access, SQL Server, etc.
-> I agree, should be changed,
