Difference between revisions of "Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions"

From forestDSS
Jump to: navigation, search
(Forsys_add_wg_subthemes.py)
 
Line 12: Line 12:
 
|Has goods and services dimension=Market non-wood products, Market services, Market wood products, Non-market services
 
|Has goods and services dimension=Market non-wood products, Market services, Market wood products, Non-market services
 
|Has decision making dimension=More than one decision maker/stakeholder
 
|Has decision making dimension=More than one decision maker/stakeholder
|Has related DSS=FORFUN
 
 
|Has country=Italy
 
|Has country=Italy
 +
|Has related DSS=FORFUN
 
|Has related case=Italy-Assessing forest functions at stand scale in a sub-regional forest plan in the Dolomites
 
|Has related case=Italy-Assessing forest functions at stand scale in a sub-regional forest plan in the Dolomites
|Has actor perspective=Facilitator, User
+
|Has working group theme=Knowledge management, Participation
|Has working group theme=Participation, Knowledge management
+
 
|Has DSS development=Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Description of DSS development
 
|Has DSS development=Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Description of DSS development
 
|Has decision support techniques=Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Decision support techniques
 
|Has decision support techniques=Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Decision support techniques
 
|Has knowledge management processes=Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Knowledge management process
 
|Has knowledge management processes=Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Knowledge management process
 
|Has support for social participation=Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Support of social participation
 
|Has support for social participation=Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Support of social participation
 +
|Has actor perspective=Facilitator, User
 
}}
 
}}
[[Wg4::Transparency]]
+
[[Wg4::Transparency]] [[Wg3::Transfer]]

Latest revision as of 11:05, 17 September 2013

Lesson

ID 65
Has statement Involving local stakeholders in ranking the functions allowed to show them how their contribution can influence the management decisions.
Has evidence The public discussions called for a clarification of some concepts about which there were significant misunderstandings and preconceptions.
Has consequences Each stakeholder can accept that his own point of view is not always the best.
Has recommendation for action The different scenarios were presented to the stakeholders in a series of public meetings.
Has domain Knowledge management, Participation
Has DSS development stage
Has decision stage
Has temporal scale Long term (strategic), Medium term (tactical)
Has spatial context Spatial with no neighbourhood interrelations
Has spatial scale Stand level
Has objectives dimension Multiple objectives
Has goods and services dimension Market non-wood products, Market services, Market wood products, Non-market services
Has decision making dimension More than one decision maker/stakeholder
Has country Italy
Has reference
Has related DSS FORFUN
Has related case Italy-Assessing forest functions at stand scale in a sub-regional forest plan in the Dolomites
Has related lesson
Has other relevant information
Has working group theme Knowledge management, Participation
Has DSS development Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Description of DSS development
Has decision support techniques Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Decision support techniques
Has knowledge management processes Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Knowledge management process
Has support for social participation Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Support of social participation
Has actor perspective Facilitator, User
Has researcher role
Has user role
Has developer role
Transparency Transfer