Difference between revisions of "Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions"
From forestDSS
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) (Seans automated transfer) |
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "Stakeholder involvement in the development and use of DSS" to "Participation") |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|Has consequences=Each stakeholder can accept that his own point of view is not always the best. | |Has consequences=Each stakeholder can accept that his own point of view is not always the best. | ||
|Has recommendation for action=The different scenarios were presented to the stakeholders in a series of public meetings. | |Has recommendation for action=The different scenarios were presented to the stakeholders in a series of public meetings. | ||
| − | |Has domain=Knowledge management, | + | |Has domain=Knowledge management, Participation |
|Has temporal scale=Long term (strategic), Medium term (tactical) | |Has temporal scale=Long term (strategic), Medium term (tactical) | ||
|Has spatial context=Spatial with no neighbourhood interrelations | |Has spatial context=Spatial with no neighbourhood interrelations | ||
Revision as of 02:56, 31 July 2013
Lesson
| ID | |
|---|---|
| Has statement | Involving local stakeholders in ranking the functions allowed to show them how their contribution can influence the management decisions. |
| Has evidence | The public discussions called for a clarification of some concepts about which there were significant misunderstandings and preconceptions. |
| Has consequences | Each stakeholder can accept that his own point of view is not always the best. |
| Has recommendation for action | The different scenarios were presented to the stakeholders in a series of public meetings. |
| Has domain | Knowledge management, Participation |
| Has DSS development stage | |
| Has decision stage | |
| Has temporal scale | Long term (strategic), Medium term (tactical) |
| Has spatial context | Spatial with no neighbourhood interrelations |
| Has spatial scale | Stand level |
| Has objectives dimension | Multiple objectives |
| Has goods and services dimension | Market non-wood products, Market services, Market wood products, Non-market services |
| Has decision making dimension | More than one decision maker/stakeholder |
| Has country | Italy |
| Has reference | |
| Has related DSS | FORFUN |
| Has related case | Italy-Assessing forest functions at stand scale in a sub-regional forest plan in the Dolomites |
| Has related lesson | |
| Has other relevant information | |
| Has working group theme | Participation, Knowledge management |
| Has DSS development | Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Description of DSS development |
| Has decision support techniques | Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Decision support techniques |
| Has knowledge management processes | Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Knowledge management process |
| Has support for social participation | Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Support of social participation |
| Has actor perspective | Facilitator, User |
| Has researcher role | |
| Has user role | |
| Has developer role |
