Wanted pages

Jump to: navigation, search

Showing below up to 500 results in range #1 to #500.

View (previous 500 | next 500) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

  1. Type:String‏‎ (191 links)
  2. Type:Page‏‎ (49 links)
  3. Type:Number‏‎ (28 links)
  4. Type:Text‏‎ (24 links)
  5. Transfer‏‎ (22 links)
  6. None‏‎ (19 links)
  7. TestDSS‏‎ (19 links)
  8. Non-computerized DSS‏‎ (16 links)
  9. Application‏‎ (15 links)
  10. Generation‏‎ (13 links)
  11. Type:Boolean‏‎ (12 links)
  12. Interface‏‎ (12 links)
  13. Capabilities‏‎ (11 links)
  14. Projmgt‏‎ (10 links)
  15. Utilities‏‎ (10 links)
  16. Basic structure‏‎ (10 links)
  17. Identification‏‎ (10 links)
  18. DSS‏‎ (10 links)
  19. Problem specification‏‎ (10 links)
  20. Evaluation‏‎ (9 links)
  21. Forest fire‏‎ (9 links)
  22. SILVANET‏‎ (8 links)
  23. Woodstock + Stanley‏‎ (8 links)
  24. Learning‏‎ (8 links)
  25. Fuzzy logic‏‎ (7 links)
  26. Type:URL‏‎ (7 links)
  27. Habitat suitability‏‎ (7 links)
  28. Provide missing help/documentation service‏‎ (7 links)
  29. Students studying forest management planning procedures and processes were very useful ‘guinea pigs’‏‎ (7 links)
  30. Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process.‏‎ (7 links)
  31. Resources‏‎ (6 links)
  32. Communication‏‎ (6 links)
  33. Documentation‏‎ (6 links)
  34. Structure process‏‎ (6 links)
  35. Carbon sequestration‏‎ (6 links)
  36. Haloaclontologybundle‏‎ (6 links)
  37. Storage‏‎ (6 links)
  38. Need of flexibilization of analytical tools - no "overdesigned" tool that provides too much features for the use‏‎ (6 links)
  39. Using GISCAME to test alternative land-use scenarios under climate change in the Upper Elbe Valley‏‎ (6 links)
  40. Problem formulation‏‎ (6 links)
  41. Type:Date‏‎ (6 links)
  42. Unnamed Knowledge based DSS‏‎ (5 links)
  43. Early involvement‏‎ (5 links)
  44. Carbon and nitrogen flows‏‎ (5 links)
  45. Input data‏‎ (5 links)
  46. To compare the current and the past quantitative/qualitative parameters of the forest, great effort‏‎ (5 links)
  47. Not prescriptive‏‎ (5 links)
  48. Sensivity analysis‏‎ (5 links)
  49. STANDPACK‏‎ (4 links)
  50. The restoration strategy of the dry and mesic landscape in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest‏‎ (4 links)
  51. VDDT‏‎ (4 links)
  52. KU Leuven‏‎ (4 links)
  53. Effects of data quality‏‎ (4 links)
  54. Pulpwood Supply Chain Planning in a Portuguese integrated Pulp and Paper Company‏‎ (4 links)
  55. Electronic spreadsheets‏‎ (4 links)
  56. Effects of models‏‎ (4 links)
  57. Biodiversity‏‎ (4 links)
  58. Germany:Actor Network Theory to Understand Collaborative Decision Support Systems Development in Forest Management Practice‏‎ (4 links)
  59. Conservation value‏‎ (4 links)
  60. StandSIMOPT‏‎ (4 links)
  61. T2‏‎ (4 links)
  62. Simosol‏‎ (4 links)
  63. ‏‎ (4 links)
  64. AS‏‎ (3 links)
  65. SAPPI FMS‏‎ (3 links)
  66. /sandbox‏‎ (3 links)
  67. Institutionalization‏‎ (3 links)
  68. SIMANFOR‏‎ (3 links)
  69. Integrating an ecosystem model into SADfLOR Decision Support platform for optimal forest management planning under changing climate in boreal conditions.‏‎ (3 links)
  70. Type:Email‏‎ (3 links)
  71. Watershed Condition Assessment for the Northwest Forest Plan‏‎ (3 links)
  72. /testcases‏‎ (3 links)
  73. USDA Forest Service‏‎ (3 links)
  74. Modular Forest Management DSS in NZ‏‎ (3 links)
  75. Universidade Técnica de Lisboa.‏‎ (3 links)
  76. Mushrooms‏‎ (3 links)
  77. SOSKLIMA‏‎ (3 links)
  78. Form:Case study‏‎ (3 links)
  79. Template:Documentation/docname‏‎ (3 links)
  80. Participative modelling of long-term wood production in the forest complex ‘Bosland’‏‎ (3 links)
  81. Template:Pp-meta‏‎ (3 links)
  82. Syunev 2004‏‎ (3 links)
  83. Supporting a multi stakeholders decision process in a Portuguese National Forest‏‎ (3 links)
  84. Belgium-Participative modelling of long-term wood production in the forest complex Bosland‏‎ (3 links)
  85. A Decision Support System for eucalypt forest management under climate change scenarios‏‎ (3 links)
  86. What-if analysis‏‎ (3 links)
  87. DSS development‏‎ (3 links)
  88. Actor Network Theory to Understand Collaborative Decision Support Systems Development in Forest Management Practice‏‎ (3 links)
  89. Centro de Estudos Florestais‏‎ (3 links)
  90. T4‏‎ (3 links)
  91. An agro-ecological Decision Support Systems for evaluting soil under scenarios of global change‏‎ (3 links)
  92. Instituto Superior de Agronomia‏‎ (3 links)
  93. The development and introduction of versatile DSS in Sweden‏‎ (3 links)
  94. Norwegian University of Life Sciences‏‎ (3 links)
  95. Assessing forest functions at stand scale in a sub-regional forest plan in the Dolomites‏‎ (3 links)
  96. Graphics‏‎ (3 links)
  97. The forest plan revision process in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest‏‎ (3 links)
  98. UML‏‎ (3 links)
  99. Boise-Payette-Sawtooth National Forest Plan‏‎ (3 links)
  100. Intelligent agent‏‎ (3 links)
  101. The history of a successfull forest DSS in Sweden‏‎ (3 links)
  102. Improving forestry extension services for small-scale private landowners‏‎ (3 links)
  103. Cork‏‎ (2 links)
  104. Forester GIS‏‎ (2 links)
  105. SADfLOR is a web-based tool having for this reason no software requirements.‏‎ (2 links)
  106. Bottom up approach in designing software architecture and features (OOP)‏‎ (2 links)
  107. ZEUS‏‎ (2 links)
  108. Capsis.Software‏‎ (2 links)
  109. System requirement and design‏‎ (2 links)
  110. Example DSS/SHRIMP‏‎ (2 links)
  111. SIGFOR.Software‏‎ (2 links)
  112. PractiSFM multi-resource inventory and decision support for private forest owners‏‎ (2 links)
  113. RODAL-ARBOREX‏‎ (2 links)
  114. Coming soon...‏‎ (2 links)
  115. ForMIS.Software‏‎ (2 links)
  116. Developing a management plan for the CHAMUSCA county‏‎ (2 links)
  117. SADfLOR v pp 1.0‏‎ (2 links)
  118. BoLa a specific sDSS to support land use planning in Flanders‏‎ (2 links)
  119. ---‏‎ (2 links)
  120. SILVAH.Software‏‎ (2 links)
  121. Heureka.Knowledge management process‏‎ (2 links)
  122. EcologicalSiteClassification.Software‏‎ (2 links)
  123. Enterprise Architecture‏‎ (2 links)
  124. FIS‏‎ (2 links)
  125. JOVOKEP‏‎ (2 links)
  126. Developing a collaborative management plan for the NIFP in Vale do Sousa‏‎ (2 links)
  127. GBNL‏‎ (2 links)
  128. 1) user requirements analysis following Delphi approach‏‎ (2 links)
  129. SIMfLOR‏‎ (2 links)
  130. MatrixGen.Software‏‎ (2 links)
  131. GIS and ME‏‎ (2 links)
  132. ForestGales.Software‏‎ (2 links)
  133. HedeDanmark‏‎ (2 links)
  134. KUBIK.Software‏‎ (2 links)
  135. 2) CA‏‎ (2 links)
  136. WDS.Software‏‎ (2 links)
  137. NED.Software‏‎ (2 links)
  138. PrOFA‏‎ (2 links)
  139. TAKARNET‏‎ (2 links)
  140. DSS Template‏‎ (2 links)
  141. US Department of Agriculture - Forest Service‏‎ (2 links)
  142. MAPSS.Software‏‎ (2 links)
  143. Pri.For.Man DSS.Software‏‎ (2 links)
  144. 3) version control and buck tracking system‏‎ (2 links)
  145. Analysis of logging residues chain for a sustainable bioenergy production in Alta Val di Non‏‎ (2 links)
  146. GIS‏‎ (2 links)
  147. Sustainable Management of Mediterranean Forest: Valencian Community Case‏‎ (2 links)
  148. SCRUM/Agile‏‎ (2 links)
  149. Wolschart‏‎ (2 links)
  150. Institute of Silviculture‏‎ (2 links)
  151. FVS.Software‏‎ (2 links)
  152. 4) iterative development since 2007 with permanent testing and user feed-back‏‎ (2 links)
  153. Tactical/operational forest planning in a Portuguese integrated Pulp and Paper Company‏‎ (2 links)
  154. Optimal.Software‏‎ (2 links)
  155. To be filled‏‎ (2 links)
  156. Integrating wood quality considerations in landscape-level forest planning‏‎ (2 links)
  157. ProgettoBosco a data-driven DSS for forest planning: an application in Abruzzo Region‏‎ (2 links)
  158. 5) Used for regional planning‏‎ (2 links)
  159. Template:Transclude‏‎ (2 links)
  160. Tobe filled‏‎ (2 links)
  161. LANDIS.Software‏‎ (2 links)
  162. SADfLOR web-based.Decision support techniques‏‎ (2 links)
  163. ESC.Software‏‎ (2 links)
  164. 6) Version management and feed-back collection handled by the software enterprise PiSolution GmbH‏‎ (2 links)
  165. Allocation of slope protection measures‏‎ (2 links)
  166. A comprehensive system for forest management planning in Trentino Province‏‎ (2 links)
  167. Gaya - SGIS‏‎ (2 links)
  168. ETCAP‏‎ (2 links)
  169. 7) now adaptation for land use planning in Western Africa‏‎ (2 links)
  170. User training individual to provide optimal mix of Apps‏‎ (2 links)
  171. SADPOF.Software identification‏‎ (2 links)
  172. PractiSFM.Software‏‎ (2 links)
  173. A financial analysis is an important component in the discussion about the preferences of different.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  174. Projection of stand development increases knowledge base.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  175. Question: How can stakeholders and users involvement in all phases of the DSS development project being facilitated?‏‎ (1 link)
  176. The choice to develop the system in an Excel environment was based on the status of computer.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  177. Regular ongoing engagement helped maintain interest of users.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  178. SMART - Simple Multiple Attribute Ranking‏‎ (1 link)
  179. The use of EMDS allowed the planning team to identify priority area for restoration treatments that.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  180. Austria-Improving forestry extension services for small-scale private landowners.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  181. LIFT‏‎ (1 link)
  182. Alternative silvicultural prescriptions can be computed or an already existing scenario modified. Thereby the user is supported by the scenario manager. For a given scenario‏‎ (1 link)
  183. No‏‎ (1 link)
  184. Heureka/PlanEval‏‎ (1 link)
  185. Stakeholder involvement.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  186. Need of a moderator function.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  187. It is necessary to know which data will be use as variables in the models before designing the DSS.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  188. RoNET-KNA‏‎ (1 link)
  189. Danish Forest and Nature Agency‏‎ (1 link)
  190. Use of adequate DSS development methodology.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  191. FOpP‏‎ (1 link)
  192. Despite the widely use and acceptance of the DSS there was still a lack of expertise to.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  193. House of Braganza‏‎ (1 link)
  194. Portugal-Integrating an ecosystem model into SADfLOR Decision Support platform for optimal forest management planning under changing climate in boreal conditions..Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  195. WebCorky.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  196. Model building was rapid, it was assembling the data that took by far the most time.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  197. Enabling the analyses of several ecosystem services (timber and non-timber resources) in one and the.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  198. The DSS gave the forest manager the opportunity to experiment how their emphasis towards certain.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  199. Enlarge the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  200. The ProgettoBosco working methodology, based on cooperation, successive approximations and.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  201. Adapting the software to make it possible to easily include also the output of other mechanistic.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  202. Provide procedures and structure for complete data flow.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  203. Question: Is it relevant to define a dissemination and commercialization strategy?‏‎ (1 link)
  204. The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  205. An iterative process of presenting results to subject matter experts enabled them to better.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  206. Running the DSS required special skills, therefore the local planning team required considerable.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  207. From a management perspective, to avoid the complication of testing something new, the models used.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  208. The use of the DSS improved communication among the planning team by providing a framework of the.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  209. Belgium-BoLa a specific sDSS to support land use planning in Flanders.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  210. Italy)‏‎ (1 link)
  211. Capsis.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  212. Template:DSS description, System design and development‏‎ (1 link)
  213. National Game Inventory‏‎ (1 link)
  214. Dss development process, Participation, Knowledge management‏‎ (1 link)
  215. Students studying forest management planning procedures and processes were very useful ‘guinea pigs’.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  216. Neighbourhood interrelations should be included in the generator.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  217. Forest Service - Province of Trento‏‎ (1 link)
  218. Asicam‏‎ (1 link)
  219. Value functions‏‎ (1 link)
  220. Pareto Frontier Techniques are useful for multi-criteria forest management planning.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  221. Users preferred enhanced functionality rather than useability.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  222. Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura - unità di Ricerca per il Monitoraggio e la Pianificazione Forestale‏‎ (1 link)
  223. Alterra‏‎ (1 link)
  224. List of Portuguese monarchs‏‎ (1 link)
  225. Portugal-Supporting a multi stakeholders decision process in a Portuguese National Forest.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  226. Example DSS/OYSTER OYSTER‏‎ (1 link)
  227. Finland-Integrating wood quality considerations in landscape-level forest planning.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  228. The scope of the modeling project can change significantly during the project.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  229. Analysis at the landscape level allowed the integration of concerns about multiple resources as well.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  230. SADfLOR web-based.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  231. Und Fursten‏‎ (1 link)
  232. To compare the current and the past quantitative/qualitative parameters of the forest, great effort.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  233. Brazil: Short rotation eucalyptus pulp wood plantations.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  234. Template:STSM Opportunity‏‎ (1 link)
  235. HARVEST.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  236. Multiple DSS are often needed to meet complex needs.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  237. Ireland-PractiSFM multi-resource inventory and decision support for private forest owners.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  238. Sweden-The history of a successfull forest DSS in Sweden.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  239. OpTimber‏‎ (1 link)
  240. United States-The restoration strategy of the dry and mesic landscape in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  241. Italy-Assessing forest functions at stand scale in a sub-regional forest plan in the Dolomites.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  242. DSS helped document and apply decision criteria consistently, and therefore produced a more.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  243. Afonso V of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  244. Portugal-A Decision Support System for eucalypt forest management under climate change scenarios.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  245. Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  246. MatrixGen.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  247. ETÇAP.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  248. Peter I of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  249. PractiSFM.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  250. A financial analysis is an important component in the discussion about the preferences of different.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  251. Projection of stand development increases knowledge base.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  252. Question: How can the expectations of all parties involved in the process being managed?‏‎ (1 link)
  253. The choice to develop the system in an Excel environment was based on the status of computer.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  254. Regular ongoing engagement helped maintain interest of users.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  255. Best practices‏‎ (1 link)
  256. The use of EMDS allowed the planning team to identify priority area for restoration treatments that.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  257. Austria-Improving forestry extension services for small-scale private landowners.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  258. SIMFLOR.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  259. Intensity (amount of timber) and temporal progression (period) of a silvicultural treatment.‏‎ (1 link)
  260. WISDOM‏‎ (1 link)
  261. Template:DSS description, Concrete application‏‎ (1 link)
  262. Heureka/StandWise‏‎ (1 link)
  263. Property:Has working group theme::Dss development process‏‎ (1 link)
  264. Stakeholder involvement in DSS design.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  265. Need of a moderator function.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  266. It is necessary to know which data will be use as variables in the models before designing the DSS.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  267. CAHaTraLa‏‎ (1 link)
  268. Environmental basics and stakeholder opinion are applied.‏‎ (1 link)
  269. Use of the DSS has been considered successful by the participating organizations, even though it has.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  270. PoodyBlep‏‎ (1 link)
  271. Despite the widely use and acceptance of the DSS there was still a lack of expertise to.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  272. House of Braganza-Saxe-Coburg and Gotha‏‎ (1 link)
  273. Portugal-Integrating an ecosystem model into SADfLOR Decision Support platform for optimal forest management planning under changing climate in boreal conditions..Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  274. WebCorky.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  275. Enabling the analyses of several ecosystem services (timber and non-timber resources) in one and the.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  276. The DSS gave the forest manager the opportunity to experiment how their emphasis towards certain.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  277. Enlarge the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  278. The ProgettoBosco working methodology, based on cooperation, successive approximations and.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  279. Adapting the software to make it possible to easily include also the output of other mechanistic.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  280. Provide procedures and structure for complete data flow.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  281. Question: Is the use of an appropriate language for stakeholders and users during the communication relevant?‏‎ (1 link)
  282. The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  283. An iterative process of presenting results to subject matter experts enabled them to better.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  284. Running the DSS required special skills, therefore the local planning team required considerable.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  285. From a management perspective, to avoid the complication of testing something new, the models used.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  286. The user has to be aware of the possibly large impact that the chosen land indicators and threshold.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  287. Belgium-BoLa a specific sDSS to support land use planning in Flanders.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  288. Decision process‏‎ (1 link)
  289. WFCM-DSS‏‎ (1 link)
  290. ATLAS‏‎ (1 link)
  291. Template:DSS description, Technological architecture, integration with other systems‏‎ (1 link)
  292. TUZTER‏‎ (1 link)
  293. Models & techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  294. Students studying forest management planning procedures and processes were very useful ‘guinea pigs’.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  295. United States-Boise-Payette-Sawtooth National Forest Plan.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  296. Italy-A comprehensive system for forest management planning in Trentino Province.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  297. Austral‏‎ (1 link)
  298. Web-HIPRE was used for the AHP. Since then‏‎ (1 link)
  299. Pareto Frontier Techniques are useful for multi-criteria forest management planning.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  300. Using Actor Network Theory in the design stage can help in understanding the dynamism of the network.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  301. Lack of proper documentation and support services (manual, website, etc) can severely limit the.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  302. EFI‏‎ (1 link)
  303. Luís I of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  304. Portugal-Tactical/operational forest planning in a Portuguese integrated Pulp and Paper Company.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  305. The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  306. José Borges‏‎ (1 link)
  307. Finland-Strategic planning at the national forest administration.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  308. The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  309. Analysis at the landscape level allowed the integration of concerns about multiple resources as well.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  310. Weinbau‏‎ (1 link)
  311. To compare the current and the past quantitative/qualitative parameters of the forest, great effort.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  312. Brazil: Short rotation eucalyptus pulp wood plantations.Social participation process‏‎ (1 link)
  313. SiWaWa.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  314. NED.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  315. University College Dublin‏‎ (1 link)
  316. Unclear!‏‎ (1 link)
  317. Otimização e Informática Ltda. ME‏‎ (1 link)
  318. United States-The restoration strategy of the dry and mesic landscape in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  319. Italy-Assessing forest functions at stand scale in a sub-regional forest plan in the Dolomites.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  320. DSS helped document and apply decision criteria consistently, and therefore produced a more.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  321. António, Prior of Crato‏‎ (1 link)
  322. Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  323. MatrixGen.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  324. Philip III of Spain‏‎ (1 link)
  325. Deadwood‏‎ (1 link)
  326. A financial analysis is an important component in the discussion about the preferences of different.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  327. It was decided to develop a highly detailed system in order that it could be used in the most.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  328. Question: How can the maintenance of DSS be assured after the project?‏‎ (1 link)
  329. The choice to develop the system in an Excel environment was based on the status of computer.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  330. Requirement of specialized skills can discourage some potential users.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  331. The use of EMDS allowed the planning team to identify priority area for restoration treatments that.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  332. Austria-Improving forestry extension services for small-scale private landowners.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  333. SIMFLOR.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  334. WEHAM‏‎ (1 link)
  335. Machinery costs) as well as current wood-selling prices can be modified. The user defines the type (areal or spatially selective)‏‎ (1 link)
  336. DSS for planning of forest operations technology‏‎ (1 link)
  337. Template:DSS description, Data, data model and data management‏‎ (1 link)
  338. Property:Has working group theme:Knowledge management‏‎ (1 link)
  339. Stakeholder involvement in DSS design.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  340. Need of a moderator function.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  341. It should be possible to specify the rotation time of a species not only by age but also by target.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  342. Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB)‏‎ (1 link)
  343. GISCAME is made for either mulit-participant scenario design or - by use of the CA - for scenario design depending from integrative transition probabilities for which starting conditions‏‎ (1 link)
  344. Use of the DSS has been considered successful by the participating organizations, even though it has.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  345. SAMSIZE‏‎ (1 link)
  346. House of Burgundy‏‎ (1 link)
  347. Portugal-Integrating an ecosystem model into SADfLOR Decision Support platform for optimal forest management planning under changing climate in boreal conditions..Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  348. Involving local stakeholders in ranking the functions allowed to show them tangibly how their‏‎ (1 link)
  349. Enabling the analyses of several ecosystem services (timber and non-timber resources) in one and the.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  350. The DSS models built must match the knowledge of the local forest managers, so the ability for local.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  351. The ProgettoBosco working methodology, based on cooperation, successive approximations and.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  352. Adapting the software to make it possible to easily include also the output of other mechanistic.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  353. Provide procedures and structure for complete data flow.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  354. Question: Which DSSs are developed/used to address that specific decision problem?‏‎ (1 link)
  355. The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  356. An iterative process of presenting results to subject matter experts enabled them to better.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  357. Running the DSS required special skills, therefore the local planning team required considerable.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  358. From a management perspective, to avoid the complication of testing something new, the models used.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  359. The user has to be aware of the possibly large impact that the chosen land indicators and threshold.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  360. Belgium-BoLa a specific sDSS to support land use planning in Flanders.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  361. SIPAFIT can act sometimes as a referee to settle arguments among experts, users and stakeholders.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  362. Group participation with knowledgeable people is a good way to ensure that the decision hierarchy is.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  363. Capsis.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  364. Spain-An agro-ecological Decision Support Systems for evaluting soil under scenarios of global change.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  365. Template:DSS description, User interface and outputs‏‎ (1 link)
  366. GAK 2005 ERDOTELE‏‎ (1 link)
  367. Models & techniques, Knowledge management‏‎ (1 link)
  368. O+BN‏‎ (1 link)
  369. United States-Boise-Payette-Sawtooth National Forest Plan.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  370. Italy-A comprehensive system for forest management planning in Trentino Province.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  371. Dummypage‏‎ (1 link)
  372. The design process was rather ad-hoc and sequential, as a result of step-wise funding becoming.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  373. Using Actor Network Theory in the design stage can help in understanding the dynamism of the network.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  374. Lack of proper documentation and support services (manual, website, etc) can severely limit the.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  375. European Forest Institute‏‎ (1 link)
  376. Manuel II of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  377. Portugal-Tactical/operational forest planning in a Portuguese integrated Pulp and Paper Company.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  378. Type:Record‏‎ (1 link)
  379. Sample DSS with semantic form‏‎ (1 link)
  380. The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  381. Finland-Strategic planning at the national forest administration.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  382. The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  383. Analysis at the landscape level allowed the integration of concerns about multiple resources as well.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  384. SIGFOR.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  385. Germany-Using GISCAME to test alternative land-use scenarios under climate change in the Upper Elbe Valley.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  386. To meet the needs of customer - the Forest Service - and to obtain satisfying results the.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  387. Test1‏‎ (1 link)
  388. NED.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  389. IFORIS‏‎ (1 link)
  390. LandSim‏‎ (1 link)
  391. Operational aspects of the system should be enhanced.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  392. United States-The restoration strategy of the dry and mesic landscape in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  393. Italy-Assessing forest functions at stand scale in a sub-regional forest plan in the Dolomites.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  394. DSS helped document and apply decision criteria consistently, and therefore produced a more.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  395. Beatrice of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  396. Portugal-Developing a collaborative management plan for the NIFP in Vale do Sousa.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  397. WDS.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  398. MatrixGen.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  399. Philip II of Spain‏‎ (1 link)
  400. Deer‏‎ (1 link)
  401. It was decided to develop a highly detailed system in order that it could be used in the most.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  402. Question: How is it possible to facilitate the design of user-oriented interfaces?‏‎ (1 link)
  403. The definition of standardized and specific criteria for selecting and zoning forest compartment.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  404. Requirement of specialized skills can discourage some potential users.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  405. ForestGales.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  406. The use of EMDS allowed the planning team to identify priority area for restoration treatments that.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  407. Austria-Improving forestry extension services for small-scale private landowners.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  408. SIMFLOR.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  409. WINALP‏‎ (1 link)
  410. System costs (personnel expenditure‏‎ (1 link)
  411. Template:DSS description, Documentation‏‎ (1 link)
  412. Property:Has working group theme:Models & techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  413. Stakeholder involvement in DSS design.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  414. Need of a moderator function.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  415. It should be possible to specify the rotation time of a species not only by age but also by target.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  416. UMB‏‎ (1 link)
  417. Other discrete MDCM‏‎ (1 link)
  418. Use of the DSS has been considered successful by the participating organizations, even though it has.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  419. Italy A comprehensive system for the forest management planning in Trentino Province‏‎ (1 link)
  420. House of Habsburg‏‎ (1 link)
  421. Portugal-Integrating an ecosystem model into SADfLOR Decision Support platform for optimal forest management planning under changing climate in boreal conditions..Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  422. Dog‏‎ (1 link)
  423. Enabling the analyses of several ecosystem services (timber and non-timber resources) in one and the.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  424. The DSS models built must match the knowledge of the local forest managers, so the ability for local.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  425. Enlarged decision space.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  426. The activation of an iterative process through periodical meetings permitted to all the stakeholders.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  427. Adapting the software to make it possible to easily include also the output of other mechanistic.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  428. Provide procedures and structure for complete data flow.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  429. FVS.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  430. The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  431. An iterative process of presenting results to subject matter experts enabled them to better.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  432. Running the DSS required special skills, therefore the local planning team required considerable.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  433. HaRPSS‏‎ (1 link)
  434. The user has to be aware of the possibly large impact that the chosen land indicators and threshold.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  435. SIPAFIT can act sometimes as a referee to settle arguments among experts, users and stakeholders.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  436. Group participation with knowledgeable people is a good way to ensure that the decision hierarchy is.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  437. François de Coligny‏‎ (1 link)
  438. Spain-An agro-ecological Decision Support Systems for evaluting soil under scenarios of global change.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  439. Game management‏‎ (1 link)
  440. HylobiusManagementSupportSystem.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  441. Participation, Knowledge management‏‎ (1 link)
  442. Sweden-The development and introduction of versatile DSS in Sweden.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  443. United States-Boise-Payette-Sawtooth National Forest Plan.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  444. Italy-A comprehensive system for forest management planning in Trentino Province.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  445. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU)‏‎ (1 link)
  446. Plenty‏‎ (1 link)
  447. The design process was rather ad-hoc and sequential, as a result of step-wise funding becoming.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  448. Using Actor Network Theory in the design stage can help in understanding the dynamism of the network.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  449. Lack of proper documentation and support services (manual, website, etc) can severely limit the.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  450. SMART - simple multiple attribute ranking‏‎ (1 link)
  451. Manuel I of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  452. Portugal-Tactical/operational forest planning in a Portuguese integrated Pulp and Paper Company.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  453. Form:Other methods‏‎ (1 link)
  454. FEIDESSYS‏‎ (1 link)
  455. The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  456. Finland-Strategic planning at the national forest administration.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  457. The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  458. Analysis at the landscape level allowed the integration of concerns about multiple resources as well.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  459. SIGFOR.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  460. Germany-Using GISCAME to test alternative land-use scenarios under climate change in the Upper Elbe Valley.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  461. To meet the needs of customer - the Forest Service - and to obtain satisfying results the.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  462. TreeSoftware‏‎ (1 link)
  463. Model building was rapid, it was assembling the data that took by far the most time.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  464. Heureka RegWise‏‎ (1 link)
  465. Spatial variation between regions led to the development of different regional models, which led to.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  466. NED.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  467. WESTFOREST‏‎ (1 link)
  468. VägRust‏‎ (1 link)
  469. Operational aspects of the system should be enhanced.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  470. United States-Watershed Condition Assessment for the Northwest Forest Plan.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  471. Italy-Assessing forest functions at stand scale in a sub-regional forest plan in the Dolomites.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  472. Decision criteria beyond the state of the ecosystem (for example, social values fire risk, economic.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  473. Carlos I of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  474. Portugal-Developing a collaborative management plan for the NIFP in Vale do Sousa.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  475. WDS.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  476. EcologicalSiteClassification.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  477. Philip IV of Spain‏‎ (1 link)
  478. Landscape value‏‎ (1 link)
  479. It was decided to develop a highly detailed system in order that it could be used in the most.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  480. Question: How is it possible to manage the output of models and methods in a way that they are easy to understand and interpreted by the user?‏‎ (1 link)
  481. The definition of standardized and specific criteria for selecting and zoning forest compartment.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  482. Requirement of specialized skills can discourage some potential users.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  483. The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  484. Forestry extension services‏‎ (1 link)
  485. SIMFLOR.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  486. WinForstPro‏‎ (1 link)
  487. At the Department of Forest and Soil Sciences‏‎ (1 link)
  488. GIS model for predicting salvage cut‏‎ (1 link)
  489. Template:DSS description, Installation and support‏‎ (1 link)
  490. EIR‏‎ (1 link)
  491. Property:Has working group theme:Participation‏‎ (1 link)
  492. Stakeholder involvement in DSS design.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  493. Need of flexibilization of analytical tools - no overdesigned tool that provides too much features for the use.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  494. It should be possible to specify the rotation time of a species not only by age but also by target.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  495. Property:Additional information‏‎ (1 link)
  496. Proximities‏‎ (1 link)
  497. Use of the DSS has been considered successful by the participating organizations, even though it has.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  498. CommonGIS‏‎ (1 link)
  499. John III of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  500. Portugal-Pulpwood Supply Chain Planning in a Portuguese integrated Pulp and Paper Company.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)

View (previous 500 | next 500) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)