Pages with the most revisions

Jump to: navigation, search

Showing below up to 50 results in range #101 to #150.

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

  1. OSMOSE‏‎ (11 revisions)
  2. COST Action FP0804: FORSYS:Community Portal‏‎ (11 revisions)
  3. It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development‏‎ (11 revisions)
  4. Guideline‏‎ (10 revisions)
  5. The Forest Time Machine‏‎ (10 revisions)
  6. Guidelines/Problem Type 1‏‎ (10 revisions)
  7. Sim4Tree‏‎ (10 revisions)
  8. Test‏‎ (10 revisions)
  9. Update detailed documentation of how to create / edit new DSSs‏‎ (10 revisions)
  10. FVS‏‎ (10 revisions)
  11. Lessons from Country Studies‏‎ (10 revisions)
  12. RPF‏‎ (10 revisions)
  13. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)‏‎ (9 revisions)
  14. EFISCEN‏‎ (9 revisions)
  15. Question: Which DSSs are developed/used to address that specific Forsys problem?‏‎ (9 revisions)
  16. The definition of standardized and specific criteria for selecting and zoning forest compartment‏‎ (9 revisions)
  17. Properties - Has domain - Has DSS development stage‏‎ (9 revisions)
  18. 2011-11 Leuven Case Study Agenda‏‎ (9 revisions)
  19. Test template‏‎ (9 revisions)
  20. Neighbourhood interrelations should be included in the generator‏‎ (9 revisions)
  21. To compare the current and the past quantitative-qualitative parameters of the forest, great effort‏‎ (9 revisions)
  22. Hugin‏‎ (9 revisions)
  23. SIMFLOR‏‎ (8 revisions)
  24. Import queries and other pages from the testwiki‏‎ (8 revisions)
  25. The choice to develop the system in an Excel environment was based on the status of computer‏‎ (8 revisions)
  26. The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more‏‎ (8 revisions)
  27. Заглавная страница‏‎ (8 revisions)
  28. Students studying forest management planning procedures and processes were very useful product testers‏‎ (8 revisions)
  29. Question: Which DSSs were developed by large team of people‏‎ (8 revisions)
  30. AFFOREST-sDSS.Description of DSS development‏‎ (8 revisions)
  31. Success criteria‏‎ (8 revisions)
  32. Case Study Literature Methods‏‎ (8 revisions)
  33. Users preferred enhanced functionality rather than useability‏‎ (8 revisions)
  34. Contry Report Category‏‎ (8 revisions)
  35. Using Actor Network Theory in the design stage can help in understanding the dynamism of the network‏‎ (8 revisions)
  36. GB Forestry DSS‏‎ (8 revisions)
  37. The adoption of the collaborative learning method made possible to gradually select the conceptual‏‎ (8 revisions)
  38. Adapting the software to make it possible to easily include also the output of other mechanistic‏‎ (8 revisions)
  39. Question: Which DSSs support multiple objectives‏‎ (8 revisions)
  40. Participatory Planning in a Pulpwood Supply Chain Planning in a Portuguese integrated Pulp and Paper Company‏‎ (7 revisions)
  41. HARVEST.Software‏‎ (7 revisions)
  42. Regular ongoing engagement helped maintain interest of users‏‎ (7 revisions)
  43. The DSS models built must match the knowledge of the local forest managers, so the ability for local‏‎ (7 revisions)
  44. 2011-06 Thessaloniki Case Study Notes by Research Phase‏‎ (7 revisions)
  45. Wiki editing‏‎ (7 revisions)
  46. Case-Lessons by ID with WG themes‏‎ (7 revisions)
  47. AFFOREST-sDSS.Decision support techniques‏‎ (7 revisions)
  48. SIPAFIT can act sometimes as a referee to settle arguments among experts, users and stakeholders‏‎ (7 revisions)
  49. The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable‏‎ (7 revisions)
  50. Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process‏‎ (7 revisions)

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)