Browse data: Lesson
- Choose a category:
- 1997 (0)
- 1999 (0)
- 2001 (0)
- 2006 (0)
- Abies grandis (0)
- Abies procera (0)
- Alnus spp. (0)
- Case Analysis (29)
- Case Studies (56)
- Castanea sativa (0)
- Conservation systems (0)
- Country (237)
- Country Report (1)
- DSS (70)
- DSS by cost (0)
- DSS by country (39)
- DSS by models involved (3)
- DSS by optimization methods (6)
- DSS by planning level (2)
- DSS by risk evaluation (0)
- DSS by software used (6)
- DSS by spatial level (6)
- DSS by species involved (2)
- DSS by year (2)
- DSS categories (0)
- DSS development (59)
- Decision Support Systems (0)
- Decision support system (32)
- Decision support techniques (240)
- Eucalyptus globulus (0)
- Eucalyptus nitens (0)
- Fagus sylvatica (0)
- Fire behaviour (0)
- Forest Production model (9)
- Forest and ecosystem models (8)
- Forest planning problem type (178)
- GAYA-JLP (1)
- GB Forestry DSS (10)
- Global level (0)
- Growth and Yield (0)
- Growth and yield (0)
- Growth simulator (0)
- Help (6)
- Help documents (7)
- Knowledge Management techniques (10)
- Knowledge application (4)
- Knowledge evaluation (4)
- Knowledge generation (4)
- Knowledge identification (4)
- Knowledge management process (231)
- Knowledge storage (4)
- Knowledge transfer (4)
- Larix decidua (0)
- Larix kaempferi (0)
- Larix x hybrida (0)
- Larix x marschlinsii (0)
- Lesson (89)
- MELA (2)
- MIP Optimization (0)
- Meta tests (1)
- Methods and Dimensions (2)
- Multi-platform applications (0)
- Multiple stand level (0)
- NWFP (11)
- Nutrients balance (0)
- Operating Systems (1)
- Operational level (0)
- Optimisation algorithm (41)
- Organization (7)
- Pest management (0)
- Picea sitchensis (0)
- Pinus brachyptera (0)
- Pinus nigra subsp. salzmannii var. corsicana (0)
- Pinus pinaster (0)
- Pinus radiata (0)
- Populus spp. (0)
- Pseudotsuga menziesii (0)
- Quercus robur (0)
- Quercus rubra (0)
- Quercus suber (0)
- STSM (0)
- Short-term Scientific Missions (8)
- Silviculture models (0)
- Simple multi-attribute rating technique (0)
- Simple multi-attribyte rating technique (0)
- Simulated Annealing (4)
- Simulation system (0)
- Social participation process (235)
- Software (50)
- Spatial level (0)
- Storm behaviour (0)
- Symmetrical properties (0)
- Transitive properties (0)
- Tsuga heterophylla (0)
- Umea 2013 Question (17)
- VMS (0)
- Wiki Issue (21)
- Wind hazard (0)
Showing below up to 50 results in range #1 to #50.
View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
A
- A financial analysis is an important component in the discussion about the preferences of different
- A more informative output should be generated with clear graphs and maps indicating long-term
- Actor Network Theory provides a suitable lens for exploring both technical and human aspects of DSS institutionalization in the forestry domain
- Adapting the software to make it possible to easily include also the output of other mechanistic
- Afforestion and deforestation options should be included in the management options
- An iterative process of presenting results to subject matter experts enabled them to better
- An optimisation module comparing alternative scenarios based on multi-criteria analysis should be
- Analysis at the landscape level allowed the integration of concerns about multiple resources as well
- As the core of forest DSS are models describing the development of trees and stands (growth and
B
D
- DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts to non-professional stakeholders
- DSS can help in varying the treatment according to more than one forest function
- DSS helped document and apply decision criteria consistently, and therefore produced a more
- Decision criteria beyond the state of the ecosystem (for example, social values fire risk, economic
- Despite the widely use and acceptance of the DSS there was still a lack of expertise to
E
E cont.
- Enabling the analyses of several ecosystem services (timber and non-timber resources) in one and the
- End user engagement throughout the development and deployment cycle is very important
- Enlarge the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives
- Enlarged decision space
F
- Forest managers have to analyze how their forest management interventions effect the landscape
- From a management perspective, to avoid the complication of testing something new, the models used
G
- Getting joint funding from both the forest and environmental sectors can be a successfull for
- Group participation with knowledgeable people is a good way to ensure that the decision hierarchy is
- Growth and Yield models are a key component of forest DSS
I
- Interpretative case studies can help reduce the gap between research and practice
- It is necessary to know which data will be use as variables in the models before designing the DSS
- It should be possible to specify the rotation time of a species not only by age but also by target
- It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development
L
M
M cont.
N
- Need for new models for the later use of a tool
- Need of a moderator function
- Need of flexibilization of analytical tools - no overdesigned tool that provides too much features for the use
- Neighbourhood interrelations should be included in the generator
O
P
- Pareto Frontier Techniques are useful for multi-criteria forest management planning
- Plan the system architecture based on a broad view of future possibilities
- Projection of stand development increases knowledge base
- Provide a simple version of the DSS, which new users can try out and learn quickly
- Provide missing help-documentation service
- Provide procedures and structure for complete data flow
- Providing procedures and structure for data flow from selection of field sample, performing field
R
