Difference between revisions of "Providing procedures and structure for data flow from selection of field sample, performing field"
From forestDSS
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) (Seans automated transfer) |
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) (Forsys_add_wg_subthemes.py) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Lesson | {{Lesson | ||
| + | |ID=52 | ||
|Has statement=Providing procedures and structure for data flow from selection of field sample, performing field survey and entering data into the DSS proved to be a successful approach. | |Has statement=Providing procedures and structure for data flow from selection of field sample, performing field survey and entering data into the DSS proved to be a successful approach. | ||
| − | |Has domain=Architecture, Data and data management, | + | |Has domain=Architecture, Data and data management, Project management |
| + | |Has DSS development stage=Specification | ||
|Has related case=Sweden-The history of a successfull forest DSS in Sweden | |Has related case=Sweden-The history of a successfull forest DSS in Sweden | ||
|Has other relevant information=A standardized flow of data from field survey to the analysis and planning system makes data handling easy. A drawback is the possibilities to import data from different forms of surveys. | |Has other relevant information=A standardized flow of data from field survey to the analysis and planning system makes data handling easy. A drawback is the possibilities to import data from different forms of surveys. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 13: | ||
|Has actor perspective=Developer/Architect | |Has actor perspective=Developer/Architect | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | [[Wg2::Input data]] | ||
Latest revision as of 02:33, 9 September 2013
Lesson
| ID | 52 |
|---|---|
| Has statement | Providing procedures and structure for data flow from selection of field sample, performing field survey and entering data into the DSS proved to be a successful approach. |
| Has evidence | |
| Has consequences | |
| Has recommendation for action | |
| Has domain | Architecture, Data and data management, Project management |
| Has DSS development stage | Specification |
| Has decision stage | |
| Has temporal scale | |
| Has spatial context | |
| Has spatial scale | |
| Has objectives dimension | |
| Has goods and services dimension | |
| Has decision making dimension | |
| Has country | |
| Has reference | |
| Has related DSS | |
| Has related case | Sweden-The history of a successfull forest DSS in Sweden |
| Has related lesson | |
| Has other relevant information | A standardized flow of data from field survey to the analysis and planning system makes data handling easy. A drawback is the possibilities to import data from different forms of surveys. |
| Has working group theme | Models & techniques |
| Has DSS development | Providing procedures and structure for data flow from selection of field sample, performing field.Description of DSS development |
| Has decision support techniques | Providing procedures and structure for data flow from selection of field sample, performing field.Decision support techniques |
| Has knowledge management processes | Providing procedures and structure for data flow from selection of field sample, performing field.Knowledge management process |
| Has support for social participation | Providing procedures and structure for data flow from selection of field sample, performing field.Support of social participation |
| Has actor perspective | Developer/Architect |
| Has researcher role | |
| Has user role | |
| Has developer role |
