Difference between revisions of "Knowledge management process - definitions of alternatives are not clear enough fro a non-expert user"
From forestDSS
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "Is issue closed:" to "Has issue status") |
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "Has issue status=No" to "Has issue status=Not started") |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|Has issue priority=low | |Has issue priority=low | ||
| − | |Has issue status= | + | |Has issue status=Not started |
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 23:51, 6 September 2013
| Has issue type | Bug |
|---|---|
| Has author | Tommi Suominen |
| Has responsible person or organization | EFI |
| Has issue description | The definitions of the given alternatives are not clear enough, for a normal user, to realistically fill them in as intended by the designer of this field. |
| Has issue solution | |
| Has issue priority | "low" is not in the list of possible values (1-high, 2-medium, 3-low) for this property. |
| Has task status |
