Difference between revisions of "It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development"
From forestDSS
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) (Forsys_add_wg_subthemes.py) |
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) (Forsys_add_wg_subthemes.py) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|ID=34 | |ID=34 | ||
|Has statement=It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development; | |Has statement=It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development; | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|Has evidence=Sometimes researchers and developers do not have all the necessary practical experience to understand all the exigencies of the other actors involved in the system. | |Has evidence=Sometimes researchers and developers do not have all the necessary practical experience to understand all the exigencies of the other actors involved in the system. | ||
+ | |Has consequences=End users can suggest DSS contents and features closer to their needs. Moreover, their involvement may result in a higher acceptance and usage of the system. | ||
+ | |Has recommendation for action=Ask actor categories to choose their representatives to participate in some early stage meetings and to test the first prototypes of the DSS. | ||
|Has domain=Participation, User interface and outputs | |Has domain=Participation, User interface and outputs | ||
|Has temporal scale=Long term (strategic) | |Has temporal scale=Long term (strategic) | ||
Line 20: | Line 12: | ||
|Has goods and services dimension=Market wood products, Non-market services | |Has goods and services dimension=Market wood products, Non-market services | ||
|Has decision making dimension=More than one decision maker | |Has decision making dimension=More than one decision maker | ||
+ | |Has reference=Vacik H., Lexer M.J. and Englisch M. 2004. Einsatz des Decision Support Systems DSD v1.1 zur Unterstützung der forstlichen Beratung im Landesforstdienst. Forstarchiv 75 (5): 1-11. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Lexer, M.J., Vacik, H., Palmetzhofer, D. and Oitzinger, G. 2005. A decision support tool to improve forestry extension services for small private landowners in southern Austria. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 49, 1: 81-102. | ||
|Has related DSS=SIPAFIT | |Has related DSS=SIPAFIT | ||
|Has country=Italy | |Has country=Italy | ||
+ | |Has related case=Italy-A comprehensive system for forest management planning in Trentino Province | ||
+ | |Has actor perspective=Developer/Architect, Facilitator, User | ||
+ | |Has working group theme=Dss development process, Participation | ||
+ | |Has DSS development=It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development.Description of DSS development | ||
+ | |Has decision support techniques=It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development.Decision support techniques | ||
+ | |Has knowledge management processes=It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development.Knowledge management process | ||
+ | |Has support for social participation=It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development.Support of social participation | ||
|Has researcher role= | |Has researcher role= | ||
− | |Has | + | |Has user role= |
− | |Has recommendation | + | |Has developer role=Architect, Project manager |
+ | |Has recommendation=Provide help and documentation either integrated in the DSS or accessible on the web | ||
+ | |Has project management= | ||
+ | |Has stakeholder involvement= | ||
+ | |Has system testing= | ||
+ | |Has DSS development stage=Specification | ||
+ | |Has justification=Hard copy of the manual only is not attractive for the user. | ||
+ | |Has decision stage=organization | ||
|Has other relevant information=This requirement depends on the problem statement; some problems can be solved without neighbourhood interrelations. Some problems with neighbourhood interrelations, such as demanding a large area of interior conditions (no edge effects) tend to be large combinatorial problems. | |Has other relevant information=This requirement depends on the problem statement; some problems can be solved without neighbourhood interrelations. Some problems with neighbourhood interrelations, such as demanding a large area of interior conditions (no edge effects) tend to be large combinatorial problems. | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[Wg1::Participation]] | [[Wg1::Participation]] |
Revision as of 23:29, 8 September 2013
Lesson
ID | 34 |
---|---|
Has statement | It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development; |
Has evidence | Sometimes researchers and developers do not have all the necessary practical experience to understand all the exigencies of the other actors involved in the system. |
Has consequences | End users can suggest DSS contents and features closer to their needs. Moreover, their involvement may result in a higher acceptance and usage of the system. |
Has recommendation for action | Ask actor categories to choose their representatives to participate in some early stage meetings and to test the first prototypes of the DSS. |
Has domain | Participation, User interface and outputs |
Has DSS development stage | Specification |
Has decision stage | organization |
Has temporal scale | Long term (strategic) |
Has spatial context | Spatial with no neighbourhood interrelations |
Has spatial scale | Forest level, Stand level |
Has objectives dimension | Multiple objectives |
Has goods and services dimension | Market wood products, Non-market services |
Has decision making dimension | More than one decision maker |
Has country | Italy |
Has reference | Vacik H., Lexer M.J. and Englisch M. 2004. Einsatz des Decision Support Systems DSD v1.1 zur Unterstützung der forstlichen Beratung im Landesforstdienst. Forstarchiv 75 (5): 1-11.
Lexer, M.J., Vacik, H., Palmetzhofer, D. and Oitzinger, G. 2005. A decision support tool to improve forestry extension services for small private landowners in southern Austria. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 49, 1: 81-102. |
Has related DSS | SIPAFIT |
Has related case | Italy-A comprehensive system for forest management planning in Trentino Province |
Has related lesson | |
Has other relevant information | This requirement depends on the problem statement; some problems can be solved without neighbourhood interrelations. Some problems with neighbourhood interrelations, such as demanding a large area of interior conditions (no edge effects) tend to be large combinatorial problems. |
Has working group theme | Dss development process, Participation |
Has DSS development | It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development.Description of DSS development |
Has decision support techniques | It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development.Decision support techniques |
Has knowledge management processes | It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development.Knowledge management process |
Has support for social participation | It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development.Support of social participation |
Has actor perspective | Developer/Architect, Facilitator, User |
Has researcher role | |
Has user role | |
Has developer role | Architect, Project manager |