Difference between revisions of "Enlarge the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives"
From forestDSS
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) (Seans automated transfer) |
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) (Forsys_change_property_values.py) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|Has consequences=In order to cope with objetives and constraints set by the decision maker, some non-optimal management alternatives (at stand level) may be selected (at forest/landscape level) in a decision process | |Has consequences=In order to cope with objetives and constraints set by the decision maker, some non-optimal management alternatives (at stand level) may be selected (at forest/landscape level) in a decision process | ||
|Has recommendation for action=Use an automated prescription writter within a DSS. This is a useful tool in that allows enlarging the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives. It also allows computing the impact of these management alternatives on forest productivity. | |Has recommendation for action=Use an automated prescription writter within a DSS. This is a useful tool in that allows enlarging the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives. It also allows computing the impact of these management alternatives on forest productivity. | ||
− | |Has domain= | + | |Has domain=Architecture, Stakeholder involvement in the development and use of DSS |
|Has temporal scale=Long term (strategic), Medium term (tactical) | |Has temporal scale=Long term (strategic), Medium term (tactical) | ||
|Has spatial context=Non spatial, Spatial with no neighbourhood interrelations | |Has spatial context=Non spatial, Spatial with no neighbourhood interrelations | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
|Has user role=Decision maker, Forest manager, Stakeholders | |Has user role=Decision maker, Forest manager, Stakeholders | ||
|Has developer role=Architect, Programmer, Project manager | |Has developer role=Architect, Programmer, Project manager | ||
+ | |Has DSS development stage=Use | ||
}} | }} | ||
− |
Revision as of 07:05, 30 July 2013
Lesson
ID | |
---|---|
Has statement | By generating a large set of potential management alternatives (e.g. using a prescriptions generator) is it possible to enlarge the decision space. This generates more information and gives more flexibility when developping alternative management plans. |
Has evidence | Automatic generation of management alternatives enlarges information for the Decision Maker. It allows to get information on the effects of different management alternatives in the different goods and services. This information is usually limited for decision makers. |
Has consequences | In order to cope with objetives and constraints set by the decision maker, some non-optimal management alternatives (at stand level) may be selected (at forest/landscape level) in a decision process |
Has recommendation for action | Use an automated prescription writter within a DSS. This is a useful tool in that allows enlarging the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives. It also allows computing the impact of these management alternatives on forest productivity. |
Has domain | Architecture, Stakeholder involvement in the development and use of DSS |
Has DSS development stage | Use |
Has decision stage | |
Has temporal scale | Long term (strategic), Medium term (tactical) |
Has spatial context | Non spatial, Spatial with no neighbourhood interrelations |
Has spatial scale | Stand level |
Has objectives dimension | Multiple objectives |
Has goods and services dimension | Market non-wood products, Market services, Market wood products, Non-market services |
Has decision making dimension | More than one decision maker, More than one decision maker/stakeholder, Single decision maker |
Has country | Portugal |
Has reference | Garcia-Gonzalo, J., Palma, J., Freire, J., Tomé, M. Mateus, R., Luiz Carlos E. Rodríguez., Bushenkov, V., Borges, J. G. A decision support system for a multi stakeholder’s decision process in a Portuguese National Forest. Forest Systems. (In print). |
Has related DSS | SADfLOR v pp 1.0 |
Has related case | Portugal-Supporting a multi stakeholders decision process in a Portuguese National Forest |
Has related lesson | Enlarge the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives.Description of DSS development |
Has other relevant information | |
Has working group theme | Dss development process |
Has DSS development | Enlarge the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives.Description of DSS development |
Has decision support techniques | Enlarge the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives.Decision support techniques |
Has knowledge management processes | Enlarge the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives.Knowledge management process |
Has support for social participation | Enlarge the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives.Support of social participation |
Has actor perspective | Developer/Architect, Researcher, User |
Has researcher role | |
Has user role | Decision maker, Forest manager, Stakeholders |
Has developer role | Architect, Programmer, Project manager |