Difference between revisions of "Case Studies and Lessons Learned Workgroup Progress Reports"
From forestDSS
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) m |
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Case study literature database== | ==Case study literature database== | ||
* Investigate possible technologies for managing/sharing case study literature | * Investigate possible technologies for managing/sharing case study literature | ||
| − | ** e.g. [http://www.mendeley.com/ | + | ** e.g. [http://www.mendeley.com/ Mendeley] or [http://www.citeulike.org/ Citeulike] |
| + | |||
| + | ==Publications== | ||
| + | * Think of publication possibilities for case study work | ||
==DONE== | ==DONE== | ||
Revision as of 16:31, 24 November 2011
Develop case study guidelines
- Synthesize Leuven discussion and update case study guidelines on the wiki
- E-mail Forsys participants about important guidelines updates
Manage case study contributions
- Develop semantic form for entering case studies into the wiki
- Solicit case studies from the Forsys network
- Review and comment on case studies submitted
- Answer questions, resolve issues
Case study literature database
- Investigate possible technologies for managing/sharing case study literature
Publications
- Think of publication possibilities for case study work
DONE
Before the Leuven 2011 meeting
- Develop two (or more) documents:
- Case Study Notes by Research Phase: organize information already generated about the case study guidelines
- 2011-11_Leuven_Case_Study_Agenda
- Gather further information on case studies (STC sends request to country representatives)
- Existing forest DSS case studies
- Potential forest DSS case studies
- Other relevant literature (methods, theories, etc)
At Leuven 2011 meeting
- Give case study introductory presentation
- Each STC member leads a subgroup on assigned task
- Develop & present a time line for the work on the case studies
- incl. meeting of the STC
- incl. clear division of responsibilities
