Difference between revisions of "Case Studies and Lessons Learned Workgroup Progress Reports"

From forestDSS
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[category:Case Studies]]
 
[[category:Case Studies]]
 
[[category:Meeting Nov 2011]]
 
[[category:Meeting Nov 2011]]
 +
<div style="float:right;">__TOC__</div>
  
 
==Develop case study guidelines==
 
==Develop case study guidelines==
Line 14: Line 15:
 
==Case study literature database==
 
==Case study literature database==
 
* Investigate possible technologies for managing/sharing case study literature
 
* Investigate possible technologies for managing/sharing case study literature
** e.g. [[http://www.mendeley.com/ | Mendeley]] or [[http://www.citeulike.org/]]
+
** e.g. [http://www.mendeley.com/ | Mendeley] or [http://www.citeulike.org/|Citeulike]
  
 
==DONE==
 
==DONE==

Revision as of 16:26, 24 November 2011

Develop case study guidelines

  • Synthesize Leuven discussion and update case study guidelines on the wiki
  • E-mail Forsys participants about important guidelines updates

Manage case study contributions

  • Develop semantic form for entering case studies into the wiki
  • Solicit case studies from the Forsys network
  • Review and comment on case studies submitted
  • Answer questions, resolve issues

Case study literature database

  • Investigate possible technologies for managing/sharing case study literature

DONE

Before the Leuven 2011 meeting

  • Develop two (or more) documents:
  • Gather further information on case studies (STC sends request to country representatives)
    • Existing forest DSS case studies
    • Potential forest DSS case studies
    • Other relevant literature (methods, theories, etc)

At Leuven 2011 meeting

  • Give case study introductory presentation
  • Each STC member leads a subgroup on assigned task
  • Develop & present a time line for the work on the case studies
    • incl. meeting of the STC
    • incl. clear division of responsibilities