Difference between revisions of "Case Studies and Lessons Learned Workgroup Progress Reports"
From forestDSS
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) m |
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[category:Meeting Nov 2011]] | [[category:Meeting Nov 2011]] | ||
| − | ==Before the Leuven 2011 meeting== | + | ==Develop case study guidelines== |
| + | * Synthesize Leuven discussion and update case study guidelines on the wiki | ||
| + | * E-mail Forsys participants about important guidelines updates | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Manage case study contributions== | ||
| + | * Develop semantic form for entering case studies into the wiki | ||
| + | * Solicit case studies from the Forsys network | ||
| + | * Review and comment on case studies submitted | ||
| + | * Answer questions, resolve issues | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Case study literature database== | ||
| + | * Investigate possible technologies for managing/sharing case study literature | ||
| + | ** e.g. [[http://www.mendeley.com/ | Mendeley]] or [[http://www.citeulike.org/]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==DONE== | ||
| + | ===Before the Leuven 2011 meeting=== | ||
*Develop two (or more) documents: | *Develop two (or more) documents: | ||
** [[Case Study Notes by Research Phase]]: organize information already generated about the case study guidelines | ** [[Case Study Notes by Research Phase]]: organize information already generated about the case study guidelines | ||
| Line 11: | Line 26: | ||
** Other relevant literature (methods, theories, etc) | ** Other relevant literature (methods, theories, etc) | ||
| − | ==At Leuven 2011 meeting== | + | ===At Leuven 2011 meeting=== |
* Give case study introductory presentation | * Give case study introductory presentation | ||
* Each STC member leads a subgroup on assigned task | * Each STC member leads a subgroup on assigned task | ||
| Line 17: | Line 32: | ||
** incl. meeting of the STC | ** incl. meeting of the STC | ||
** incl. clear division of responsibilities | ** incl. clear division of responsibilities | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 16:24, 24 November 2011
Contents
Develop case study guidelines
- Synthesize Leuven discussion and update case study guidelines on the wiki
- E-mail Forsys participants about important guidelines updates
Manage case study contributions
- Develop semantic form for entering case studies into the wiki
- Solicit case studies from the Forsys network
- Review and comment on case studies submitted
- Answer questions, resolve issues
Case study literature database
- Investigate possible technologies for managing/sharing case study literature
- e.g. [| Mendeley] or [[1]]
DONE
Before the Leuven 2011 meeting
- Develop two (or more) documents:
- Case Study Notes by Research Phase: organize information already generated about the case study guidelines
- 2011-11_Leuven_Case_Study_Agenda
- Gather further information on case studies (STC sends request to country representatives)
- Existing forest DSS case studies
- Potential forest DSS case studies
- Other relevant literature (methods, theories, etc)
At Leuven 2011 meeting
- Give case study introductory presentation
- Each STC member leads a subgroup on assigned task
- Develop & present a time line for the work on the case studies
- incl. meeting of the STC
- incl. clear division of responsibilities
