Difference between revisions of "Case Studies and Lessons Learned Workgroup Progress Reports"

From forestDSS
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
 
(27 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[category:Case Studies]]
 
[[category:Case Studies]]
−
[[category:Meeting Nov 2011]]
+
[[category:Lessons]]
 +
__NOTOC__
  
−
Here are some ideas for your feedback:
+
==2015==
 +
* Sean Gordon and Keith Reynolds participating on the board of directors for the newly reformed [http://www.spatial.redlands.edu/sds/ Spatial Decision Support Consortium]
 +
** Also participating as members: Stephen Bathgate, Luc Boerboom, and Duncan Ray
  
−
Desired result of Nov 2011 case study activities
+
==2014==
−
* Agreement on the outline of a common plan for conducting the case studies, including decisions on purposes, methods (case definition, sampling, analysis), and reporting results
+
* Feb - Apr : working group members participate in TrainForDSS Erasmus+ funding proposal (not successful)
 +
* Nov 2014 : SJFR article published: Gordon, S. N.; Floris, A.; Boerboom, L.; Lämås, T.; Eriksson, L. O.; Nieuwenhuis, M.; Garcia, J. and Rodriguez, L. 2014. Studying the use of forest management decision support systems: An initial synthesis of lessons learned from case studies compiled using a semantic wiki. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2013.856463
  
−
'''What should the case study STC do before, at, and after the November meeting? '''
+
==2013==
 +
* Feb 2013 : CTSC meets to review and synthesize cases for presentation/publication/contributing to FORSYS guidelines
 +
* Mar 2013: CSTC finishes case synthesis article to inform broader FORSYS guidelines
 +
* April 2013 : Selected cases and synthesis presented at Umea conference; case synthesis paper submitted for the FORSYS special issue of the Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research
 +
* July - Sep 2013 : Addressed peer review comments on SJFR article
 +
* Oct 2013 : Revised SJFR article accepted for publication
  
−
Before the Nov meeting
+
==2012==
−
*Plan the Nov 2011 case study activities
+
* Mar - Apr 2012 : Case study technical committee (CSTC) develops example cases
−
*Develop two (or more) documents:  
+
* May (Zvolen meeting) : CSTC reports on progress and coordinates work with other WGs
−
** [[Case Study Guidelines]]: the basic framework we want people to build on at the Nov meeting (most important points for discussion)
+
* Sept 2012 : CSTC representatives participate in Wiki Task Force meeting; discuss how to integrate cases into semantic wiki
−
** [[Case Study Notes by Research Phase]]: further background information to consider in developing the guidelines
+
* Oct 2012: CSTC provides develops & tests [[Form:Case study|case input form]] for semantic wiki
−
*Gather further information on case studies
+
* Nov 2012: CSTC solicits short cases from Forsys participants
−
** Existing forest DSS case study literature
+
* Nov 2012 - Jan 2013 : CSTC follow up on potential cases, answer any questions, provide feedback on drafts
−
** Other relevant literature (methods, etc)
+
  
−
At Nov meeting
+
==2011==
 +
===Before the Leuven 2011 meeting===
 +
Develop two (or more) documents:
 +
** [[Case Study Notes by Research Phase]]: organize information already generated about the case study guidelines
 +
** [[2011-11_Leuven_Case_Study_Agenda]]
 +
*Gather further information on case studies (STC sends request to country representatives)
 +
** Existing forest DSS case studies
 +
** Potential forest DSS case studies
 +
** Other relevant literature (methods, theories, etc)
 +
===At Leuven 2011 meeting===
 
* Give case study introductory presentation
 
* Give case study introductory presentation
−
* Lead each subgroup on assigned task
+
* Each STC member leads a subgroup on assigned task
 +
* Develop & present a time line for the work on the case studies
 +
** incl. meeting of the STC
 +
** incl. clear division of responsibilities
  
−
After Nov meeting
+
===After Leuven 2011 meeting===
−
* Synthesize information into case study guidelines
+
* Synthesized Leuven discussion and updated [[Case Study Guidelines]] on the wiki
−
* Distribute the guidelines to the Forsys network
+
* Developed semantic wiki form for [[STSM Opportunities]]
−
* Track progress of countries in Forsys network
+
−
* Answer questions, resolve issues
+
  
−
'''How to maneuver the November meeting discussions/work if we are something like 35 persons with 2 rather big rooms at our disposal (and perhaps smaller groups can find some space in the surroundings as well)? Having a common discussion all along might be difficult (or not so productive). Depending on how we divide the sessions, one may start thinking about how to compose the guidelines out of your material.'''
+
*
−
 
+
−
Here are some ideas for your feedback:
+
−
*[30 minutes] begin with a brief common presentation and discussion on progress to date. Outline tasks for meeting subgroups (overall task is to build more details on framework for conducting case studies). Answer any general questions.
+
−
*[1.5 hours] Break into ~4 subgroups with ~8 people each, trying to get even representation from each WG in each, including one of us in each (because it looks like case studies have already been discussed by each WG in Greece, now we could try to synthesize across WGs). All groups would have the same assignment: to review the current state of the case study framework, provide feedback, and develop more detail.
+
−
*[30 min] Groups would report a summary of their suggestions back to whole group
+
−
*[30 min] Synthesis discussion
+

Latest revision as of 16:10, 16 September 2015


2015

  • Sean Gordon and Keith Reynolds participating on the board of directors for the newly reformed Spatial Decision Support Consortium
    • Also participating as members: Stephen Bathgate, Luc Boerboom, and Duncan Ray

2014

  • Feb - Apr : working group members participate in TrainForDSS Erasmus+ funding proposal (not successful)
  • Nov 2014 : SJFR article published: Gordon, S. N.; Floris, A.; Boerboom, L.; Lämås, T.; Eriksson, L. O.; Nieuwenhuis, M.; Garcia, J. and Rodriguez, L. 2014. Studying the use of forest management decision support systems: An initial synthesis of lessons learned from case studies compiled using a semantic wiki. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2013.856463

2013

  • Feb 2013 : CTSC meets to review and synthesize cases for presentation/publication/contributing to FORSYS guidelines
  • Mar 2013: CSTC finishes case synthesis article to inform broader FORSYS guidelines
  • April 2013 : Selected cases and synthesis presented at Umea conference; case synthesis paper submitted for the FORSYS special issue of the Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research
  • July - Sep 2013 : Addressed peer review comments on SJFR article
  • Oct 2013 : Revised SJFR article accepted for publication

2012

  • Mar - Apr 2012 : Case study technical committee (CSTC) develops example cases
  • May (Zvolen meeting) : CSTC reports on progress and coordinates work with other WGs
  • Sept 2012 : CSTC representatives participate in Wiki Task Force meeting; discuss how to integrate cases into semantic wiki
  • Oct 2012: CSTC provides develops & tests case input form for semantic wiki
  • Nov 2012: CSTC solicits short cases from Forsys participants
  • Nov 2012 - Jan 2013 : CSTC follow up on potential cases, answer any questions, provide feedback on drafts

2011

Before the Leuven 2011 meeting

Develop two (or more) documents:

  • Gather further information on case studies (STC sends request to country representatives)
    • Existing forest DSS case studies
    • Potential forest DSS case studies
    • Other relevant literature (methods, theories, etc)

At Leuven 2011 meeting

  • Give case study introductory presentation
  • Each STC member leads a subgroup on assigned task
  • Develop & present a time line for the work on the case studies
    • incl. meeting of the STC
    • incl. clear division of responsibilities

After Leuven 2011 meeting

Retrieved from "http://www.forestdss.org/wiki/index.php?title=Case_Studies_and_Lessons_Learned_Workgroup_Progress_Reports&oldid=11029"