Difference between revisions of "Case Studies and Lessons Learned Workgroup Progress Reports"

From forestDSS
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
 
(35 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
''How to maneuver the discussions/work if we are something like 35 persons with 2 rather big rooms at our disposal (and perhaps smaller groups can find some space in the surroundings as well)? Having a common discussion all along might be difficult (or not so productive). Depending on how we divide the sessions, one may start thinking about how to compose the material out of your material.''
+
[[category:Case Studies]]
 +
[[category:Lessons]]
 +
__NOTOC__
  
−
Here are some ideas for group feedback:
+
==2015==
−
*[30 minutes] begin with a brief common presentation and discussion on progress to date and next steps for subgroups (build more details on framework for conduction case studies); answer any general questions
+
* Sean Gordon and Keith Reynolds participating on the board of directors for the newly reformed [http://www.spatial.redlands.edu/sds/ Spatial Decision Support Consortium]
−
*[1.5 hours] Break into ~4 subgroups with ~8 people each, trying to get even representation from each WG in each, including one of us in each (because it looks like case studies have already been discussed by each WG in Greece, now we could try to synthesize across WGs)
+
** Also participating as members: Stephen Bathgate, Luc Boerboom, and Duncan Ray
−
All groups would have the same assignment: to review the current state of the case study framework and provide feedback
+
−
*[30 min] Groups would report a summary of their suggestions back to whole group
+
−
*[30 min] Synthesis discussion
+
  
−
''Another matter is the case study STC and how it can be fruitfully used before, at and after the meeting? Is there some kind of assignments we should give to the STC (with one member from each WG)?''
+
==2014==
 +
* Feb - Apr : working group members participate in TrainForDSS Erasmus+ funding proposal (not successful)
 +
* Nov 2014 : SJFR article published: Gordon, S. N.; Floris, A.; Boerboom, L.; Lämås, T.; Eriksson, L. O.; Nieuwenhuis, M.; Garcia, J. and Rodriguez, L. 2014. Studying the use of forest management decision support systems: An initial synthesis of lessons learned from case studies compiled using a semantic wiki. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2013.856463
 +
 
 +
==2013==
 +
* Feb 2013 : CTSC meets to review and synthesize cases for presentation/publication/contributing to FORSYS guidelines
 +
* Mar 2013: CSTC finishes case synthesis article to inform broader FORSYS guidelines
 +
* April 2013 : Selected cases and synthesis presented at Umea conference; case synthesis paper submitted for the FORSYS special issue of the Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research
 +
* July - Sep 2013 : Addressed peer review comments on SJFR article
 +
* Oct 2013 : Revised SJFR article accepted for publication
 +
 
 +
==2012==
 +
* Mar - Apr 2012 : Case study technical committee (CSTC) develops example cases
 +
* May (Zvolen meeting) : CSTC reports on progress and coordinates work with other WGs
 +
* Sept 2012 : CSTC representatives participate in Wiki Task Force meeting; discuss how to integrate cases into semantic wiki
 +
* Oct 2012: CSTC provides develops & tests [[Form:Case study|case input form]] for semantic wiki
 +
* Nov 2012: CSTC solicits short cases from Forsys participants
 +
* Nov 2012 - Jan 2013 : CSTC follow up on potential cases, answer any questions, provide feedback on drafts
 +
 
 +
==2011==
 +
===Before the Leuven 2011 meeting===
 +
Develop two (or more) documents:
 +
** [[Case Study Notes by Research Phase]]: organize information already generated about the case study guidelines
 +
** [[2011-11_Leuven_Case_Study_Agenda]]
 +
*Gather further information on case studies (STC sends request to country representatives)
 +
** Existing forest DSS case studies
 +
** Potential forest DSS case studies
 +
** Other relevant literature (methods, theories, etc)
 +
===At Leuven 2011 meeting===
 +
* Give case study introductory presentation
 +
* Each STC member leads a subgroup on assigned task
 +
* Develop & present a time line for the work on the case studies
 +
** incl. meeting of the STC
 +
** incl. clear division of responsibilities
 +
 
 +
===After Leuven 2011 meeting===
 +
* Synthesized Leuven discussion and updated [[Case Study Guidelines]] on the wiki
 +
* Developed semantic wiki form for [[STSM Opportunities]]
 +
 
 +
*

Latest revision as of 16:10, 16 September 2015


2015

  • Sean Gordon and Keith Reynolds participating on the board of directors for the newly reformed Spatial Decision Support Consortium
    • Also participating as members: Stephen Bathgate, Luc Boerboom, and Duncan Ray

2014

  • Feb - Apr : working group members participate in TrainForDSS Erasmus+ funding proposal (not successful)
  • Nov 2014 : SJFR article published: Gordon, S. N.; Floris, A.; Boerboom, L.; Lämås, T.; Eriksson, L. O.; Nieuwenhuis, M.; Garcia, J. and Rodriguez, L. 2014. Studying the use of forest management decision support systems: An initial synthesis of lessons learned from case studies compiled using a semantic wiki. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2013.856463

2013

  • Feb 2013 : CTSC meets to review and synthesize cases for presentation/publication/contributing to FORSYS guidelines
  • Mar 2013: CSTC finishes case synthesis article to inform broader FORSYS guidelines
  • April 2013 : Selected cases and synthesis presented at Umea conference; case synthesis paper submitted for the FORSYS special issue of the Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research
  • July - Sep 2013 : Addressed peer review comments on SJFR article
  • Oct 2013 : Revised SJFR article accepted for publication

2012

  • Mar - Apr 2012 : Case study technical committee (CSTC) develops example cases
  • May (Zvolen meeting) : CSTC reports on progress and coordinates work with other WGs
  • Sept 2012 : CSTC representatives participate in Wiki Task Force meeting; discuss how to integrate cases into semantic wiki
  • Oct 2012: CSTC provides develops & tests case input form for semantic wiki
  • Nov 2012: CSTC solicits short cases from Forsys participants
  • Nov 2012 - Jan 2013 : CSTC follow up on potential cases, answer any questions, provide feedback on drafts

2011

Before the Leuven 2011 meeting

Develop two (or more) documents:

  • Gather further information on case studies (STC sends request to country representatives)
    • Existing forest DSS case studies
    • Potential forest DSS case studies
    • Other relevant literature (methods, theories, etc)

At Leuven 2011 meeting

  • Give case study introductory presentation
  • Each STC member leads a subgroup on assigned task
  • Develop & present a time line for the work on the case studies
    • incl. meeting of the STC
    • incl. clear division of responsibilities

After Leuven 2011 meeting

Retrieved from "http://www.forestdss.org/wiki/index.php?title=Case_Studies_and_Lessons_Learned_Workgroup_Progress_Reports&oldid=11029"