Difference between revisions of "An optimisation module comparing alternative scenarios based on multi-criteria analysis should be"
From forestDSS
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) |
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) (Forsys_add_wg_subthemes.py) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|ID=21 | |ID=21 | ||
|Has statement=An optimisation module comparing alternative scenarios based on multi-criteria analysis should be included in the software | |Has statement=An optimisation module comparing alternative scenarios based on multi-criteria analysis should be included in the software | ||
+ | |Has evidence=A documentation and helpsystem on the features of the DSS on hardcopy only is not attractive | ||
+ | |Has consequences=It allows to manage the heterogeneity of different forests and of forest technicians involved | ||
+ | |Has recommendation for action=Define standards for selecting and zoning forest compartment units | ||
+ | |Has domain=Data and data management, Models and methods | ||
+ | |Has temporal scale=Long term (strategic), Medium term (tactical) | ||
+ | |Has spatial context=Non spatial | ||
+ | |Has spatial scale=Stand level | ||
+ | |Has objectives dimension=Multiple objectives | ||
+ | |Has goods and services dimension=Market non-wood products, Non-market services | ||
+ | |Has decision making dimension=Single decision maker | ||
+ | |Has reference=Vacik H., Lexer M.J. and Englisch M. 2004. Einsatz des Decision Support Systems DSD v1.1 zur Unterstützung der forstlichen Beratung im Landesforstdienst. Forstarchiv 75 (5): 1-11. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Lexer, M.J., Vacik, H., Palmetzhofer, D. and Oitzinger, G. 2005. A decision support tool to improve forestry extension services for small private landowners in southern Austria. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 49, 1: 81-102. | ||
+ | |Has related DSS=ProgettoBosco | ||
+ | |Has country=Italy | ||
|Has related case=Belgium-Participative modelling of long-term wood production in the forest complex ‘Bosland’ | |Has related case=Belgium-Participative modelling of long-term wood production in the forest complex ‘Bosland’ | ||
|Has actor perspective=Developer/Architect, Researcher | |Has actor perspective=Developer/Architect, Researcher | ||
Line 9: | Line 24: | ||
|Has knowledge management processes=An optimisation module comparing alternative scenarios based on multi-criteria analysis should be.Knowledge management process | |Has knowledge management processes=An optimisation module comparing alternative scenarios based on multi-criteria analysis should be.Knowledge management process | ||
|Has support for social participation=An optimisation module comparing alternative scenarios based on multi-criteria analysis should be.Support of social participation | |Has support for social participation=An optimisation module comparing alternative scenarios based on multi-criteria analysis should be.Support of social participation | ||
+ | |Has researcher role=Decision analyst, Modeler | ||
|Has user role= | |Has user role= | ||
+ | |Has developer role=Architect, Project manager | ||
+ | |Has recommendation=Provide help and documentation either integrated in the DSS or accessible on the web | ||
+ | |Has project management= | ||
+ | |Has stakeholder involvement= | ||
+ | |Has system testing= | ||
+ | |Has DSS development stage=Use, Specification, Specification | ||
+ | |Has justification=Hard copy of the manual only is not attractive for the user. | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[Wg1::Capabilities]] [[Wg2::Resources]] [[Wg2::Utilities]] | [[Wg1::Capabilities]] [[Wg2::Resources]] [[Wg2::Utilities]] |
Revision as of 23:20, 8 September 2013
Lesson
ID | 21 |
---|---|
Has statement | An optimisation module comparing alternative scenarios based on multi-criteria analysis should be included in the software |
Has evidence | A documentation and helpsystem on the features of the DSS on hardcopy only is not attractive |
Has consequences | It allows to manage the heterogeneity of different forests and of forest technicians involved |
Has recommendation for action | Define standards for selecting and zoning forest compartment units |
Has domain | Data and data management, Models and methods |
Has DSS development stage | Use, Specification, Specification |
Has decision stage | |
Has temporal scale | Long term (strategic), Medium term (tactical) |
Has spatial context | Non spatial |
Has spatial scale | Stand level |
Has objectives dimension | Multiple objectives |
Has goods and services dimension | Market non-wood products, Non-market services |
Has decision making dimension | Single decision maker |
Has country | Italy |
Has reference | Vacik H., Lexer M.J. and Englisch M. 2004. Einsatz des Decision Support Systems DSD v1.1 zur Unterstützung der forstlichen Beratung im Landesforstdienst. Forstarchiv 75 (5): 1-11.
Lexer, M.J., Vacik, H., Palmetzhofer, D. and Oitzinger, G. 2005. A decision support tool to improve forestry extension services for small private landowners in southern Austria. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 49, 1: 81-102. |
Has related DSS | ProgettoBosco |
Has related case | Belgium-Participative modelling of long-term wood production in the forest complex ‘Bosland’ |
Has related lesson | |
Has other relevant information | |
Has working group theme | Dss development process, Models & techniques |
Has DSS development | An optimisation module comparing alternative scenarios based on multi-criteria analysis should be.Description of DSS development |
Has decision support techniques | An optimisation module comparing alternative scenarios based on multi-criteria analysis should be.Decision support techniques |
Has knowledge management processes | An optimisation module comparing alternative scenarios based on multi-criteria analysis should be.Knowledge management process |
Has support for social participation | An optimisation module comparing alternative scenarios based on multi-criteria analysis should be.Support of social participation |
Has actor perspective | Developer/Architect, Researcher |
Has researcher role | Decision analyst, Modeler |
Has user role | |
Has developer role | Architect, Project manager |