2011-06 Thessaloniki Case Study Notes by WG

From forestDSS
Revision as of 11:57, 7 June 2011 by Roc (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

WGI

Purposes: Lessons learned ! Concrete impacts of DSS in SFM Role of architecture and development process Why DSS are not used ... ?

The set of case studies should cover ... most important planning problem types (based on the number of countries mentioning them ?) most (all) regions covered by COST FORSYS (group of countries) different types of architectures and development methodologies issues like interoperability, GUI (user friendliness) successful and unsuccessful DSSs (what is successful ?) most of the temporal and spatial scales

Single case study selection criteria: - Described in the WIKI (gold flag), presented in the country report - Possibility to come in contact with developers, researchers and users?

Selection of the case studies – what kinds of case studies ? how many ? Main problem types  assessment  3 case studies Context, tradition, institutional setup (why DSS used, why not)  2

Retrieved from "http://www.forestdss.org/wiki/index.php?title=2011-06_Thessaloniki_Case_Study_Notes_by_WG&oldid=3707"