Difference between revisions of "2011-06 Thessaloniki Case Study Notes by WG"
From forestDSS
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Main problem types assessment 3 case studies | Main problem types assessment 3 case studies | ||
Context, tradition, institutional setup (why DSS used, why not) 2 | Context, tradition, institutional setup (why DSS used, why not) 2 | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
WG3 | WG3 | ||
| − | Criteria | + | Criteria |
| − | + | * Problem types should cover different countries in a wider geographical context (Non Cost countries, Cost Countries,…) | |
| − | + | * Screening of DSS is not enough – analyze certain hypothesis | |
| − | + | * What are the similarities/differences in the context of the applicationss (Who? How?) | |
Topics | Topics | ||
| − | + | * Comparing DSS for Fire management | |
| − | + | * Comparing DSS for adapting forest management under CC | |
| − | + | * Comparing DSS for utilization of forest resources for energy use | |
| − | + | * Comparing DSS for Sustainable Forest Management | |
Other issues | Other issues | ||
| − | + | * Comparing DSS in most often described problem types (reduce dimensions) | |
| − | + | * Comparing the development processes for DSS (regional, forest, stand – strategic, tactical, operational) | |
| − | + | * Comparing the process of the DSS application from KM perspective (how the tools Expert Systems, Knowledge Mapping, Web Portal are used and benchmark with others) | |
Revision as of 12:02, 7 June 2011
WGI
Purposes:
- Lessons learned !
- Concrete impacts of DSS in SFM
- Role of architecture and development process
- Why DSS are not used ... ?
The set of case studies should cover ...
- most important planning problem types (based on the number of countries mentioning them ?)
- most (all) regions covered by COST FORSYS (group of countries)
- different types of architectures and development methodologies
- issues like interoperability, GUI (user friendliness)
- successful and unsuccessful DSSs (what is successful ?)
most of the temporal and spatial scales
Single case study selection criteria: - Described in the WIKI (gold flag), presented in the country report - Possibility to come in contact with developers, researchers and users?
Selection of the case studies – what kinds of case studies ? how many ? Main problem types assessment 3 case studies Context, tradition, institutional setup (why DSS used, why not) 2
WG3
Criteria
- Problem types should cover different countries in a wider geographical context (Non Cost countries, Cost Countries,…)
- Screening of DSS is not enough – analyze certain hypothesis
- What are the similarities/differences in the context of the applicationss (Who? How?)
Topics
- Comparing DSS for Fire management
- Comparing DSS for adapting forest management under CC
- Comparing DSS for utilization of forest resources for energy use
- Comparing DSS for Sustainable Forest Management
Other issues
- Comparing DSS in most often described problem types (reduce dimensions)
- Comparing the development processes for DSS (regional, forest, stand – strategic, tactical, operational)
- Comparing the process of the DSS application from KM perspective (how the tools Expert Systems, Knowledge Mapping, Web Portal are used and benchmark with others)
